RE: [Forces-protocol] Header Section

"Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com> Sat, 23 October 2004 06:23 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA02269 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:23:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLFWh-00079Y-SW for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:37:20 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLFFy-0003cF-CG; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:20:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLF4B-0005Kg-LA for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:07:51 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA23883 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:07:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fmr06.intel.com ([134.134.136.7] helo=caduceus.jf.intel.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLFH9-0006qS-7R for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:21:15 -0400
Received: from petasus.jf.intel.com (petasus.jf.intel.com [10.7.209.6]) by caduceus.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.15 2004/01/30 18:16:28 root Exp $) with ESMTP id i9N66tBO028963; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 06:06:55 GMT
Received: from orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.54]) by petasus.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.11 2004/07/29 22:51:53 root Exp $) with SMTP id i9N6AsfW022066; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 06:10:58 GMT
Received: from orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.56]) by orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.2.35) with SMTP id M2004102223071710138 ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 23:07:18 -0700
Received: from orsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.52]) by orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 23:07:18 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Forces-protocol] Header Section
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 23:07:00 -0700
Message-ID: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02579210@orsmsx408>
Thread-Topic: [Forces-protocol] Header Section
Thread-Index: AcS4rCoBn0Gh10urTIKMGQ2b/wLugwAF4rBg
From: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
To: <hadi@znyx.com>, <avri@psg.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2004 06:07:18.0085 (UTC) FILETIME=[8CF0E750:01C4B8C6]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: forces-protocol@ietf.org, ram.gopal@nokia.com, Weiming Wang <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sounds good, Jamal. Just wanted to make sure it got a pair of eyes on it
:)

BTW, I thought we had 3 bits for Priority in the Flags in the header.
When I just looked it was missing, 

Avri is this an XML problem with the draft??


Thanks
Hormuzd

-----Original Message-----
From: Jamal Hadi Salim [mailto:hadi@znyx.com] 

On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 19:11, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote:
> Jamal,
> 
> Pls take care of the Header section, no one seems to be looking at it.
> 

Hormuzd,
Main comment on header was todo with version to remove the major minor
and just have one flat space. The other thing i dont remember is whether
we should get rid of the resvd field or not.
Some of the falgs need revisiting; however i think the revisit will make
more sense once the operations and data-path dust settles.

So my suggestion is lets have Avri make the changes to the major:minor
and probably get rid of the resvd field and leave the rest for the next
round.

Thoughts?

cheers,
jamal



_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol