Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?

"Ligang Dong" <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn> Tue, 26 October 2004 01:31 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA28631 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:31:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMGPC-0006iC-R4 for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:45:47 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMGAh-0000Yi-Fw; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:30:47 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMGA1-0000L0-2H for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:30:05 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA28537 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:30:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=202.96.99.56) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMGNF-0006es-Ro for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:44:06 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 99432.341813895; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:49:07 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dlg (unverified [202.96.99.60]) by mail.gsu.cn (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.0.11) with SMTP id <B0000089554@mail.gsu.cn>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:24:38 +0800
Message-ID: <002001c4bafa$df86cbc0$8401a8c0@dlg>
From: "Ligang Dong" <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
To: "Robert Haas" <rha@zurich.ibm.com>, <hadi@znyx.com>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E025791E5@orsmsx408> <002d01c4b50b$1ecc9c10$020aa8c0@wwm1> <1098102734.1042.134.camel@jzny.localdomain> <013101c4b51d$a50761e0$020aa8c0@wwm1> <1098134060.1077.446.camel@jzny.localdomain> <5.1.0.14.0.20041019093826.0232d418@mail.megisto.com> <055401c4b669$97a1c840$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn> <1098383190.2883.386.camel@localhost.localdomain> <00dd01c4b803$806bd620$8401a8c0@dlg> <1098442868.1112.38.camel@jzny.localdomain> <00c601c4ba72$241599d0$8401a8c0@dlg> <1098722995.1034.67.camel@jzny.localdomain> <417D61D4.6000909@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:26:52 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, ram.gopal@nokia.com, "Joel M. Halpern" <jhalpern@megisto.com>, Zsolt Haraszti <zsolt@modularnet.com>, forces-protocol@ietf.org, "Steven Blake \(petri-meat\)" <slblake@petri-meat.com>, "Wang, Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0383545370=="
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 2.5 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca

hi, 
Jamal, thank you for the summarization about this issue.
Robert, thank you for the presentation about this issue. 
We have the same objective of making the protocol simple and efficient.
best regards
Ligang
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Haas" <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
To: <hadi@znyx.com>
Cc: "Ligang Dong" <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>cn>; "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>om>; <ram.gopal@nokia.com>om>; "Steven Blake (petri-meat)" <slblake@petri-meat.com>om>; "Zsolt Haraszti" <zsolt@modularnet.com>om>; "Joel M. Halpern" <jhalpern@megisto.com>om>; <forces-protocol@ietf.org>rg>; "Wang, Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?


> Jamal,
> 
> Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> 
> >I realized after i responded to you that the approach you posted is
> >slightly different, but end goals the same. So far i think there are
> >three approaches being talked about.
> >1) Yours
> >2) Steve/Robert with MIID (whcih unfortunately made it into the draft
> >before consensus was reached)
> >  
> >
> Sorry, that was not my intent. My understanding was that there was no 
> other proposal addressing this issue in particular.
> 
> >3) What i posted 
> >  
> >
> I must have missed that.
> 
> >Maybe someone needs to present at the meeting.
> >
> >  
> >
> Definitely. A short presentation summarizing all the options. I could 
> take care of that (probably need 30 min with the discussion).
> 
> -- 
> Robert Haas
> IBM Zurich Research Laboratory
> Säumerstrasse 4
> CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland
> phone +41-1-724-8698  fax +41-1-724-8578  http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~rha
> 
_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol