Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing?
Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com> Thu, 21 October 2004 14:27 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA05514 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:27:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKe7k-0004NF-Q3 for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:41:05 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CKdmt-0006mF-3L; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:19:31 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CKdbE-0003AF-E9 for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:07:28 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA01620 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:07:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKdnq-0003ff-FV for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:20:31 -0400
Received: from northrelay04.pok.ibm.com (northrelay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.206]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/NS PXFA) with ESMTP id i9LE6UD7357980; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:06:30 -0400
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by northrelay04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id i9LE7IS8083302; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:07:20 -0400
Received: from [9.145.135.33] (sig-9-145-135-33.de.ibm.com [9.145.135.33]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA42100; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:05:30 +0200
Message-ID: <4177C1E2.4080506@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:04:18 +0200
From: Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM Research Lab
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing?
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02F5D468@orsmsx408>
In-Reply-To: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02F5D468@orsmsx408>
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a743e34ab8eb08259de9a7307caed594
Cc: ram.gopal@nokia.com, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, forces-protocol@ietf.org, avri@psg.com, hadi@znyx.com, Weiming Wang <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1194296153=="
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f2728948111f2edaaf8980b5b9de55af
Hormuzd, Section 6 is heavily impacted by the shift to "everything is an LFB". Many sections and figures require complete re-editing. To ensure consistency, we need one person to do one editing pass on the entire section first. But your list says "everybody". What if I do this first pass before tomorrow ? Or has anyone started already ? It also means that our description of the FE Protocol LFB must be enhanced, possibly including the multicast table that Zsolt started specifying. Regards, -Robert Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote: >Here is the distribution list... > >Abstract - Avri >1. Introduction - Avri >2. Definitions - Weiming >3. Protocol Overview - Jamal >4. TML Requirements - Jamal >5. Common Header - Weiming, Ligang (Jamal/Robert) >6. Protocol Messages - Hormuzd, Weiming (I expect everyone to be >involved with this one) >7. Protocol Scenarios - Hormuzd, Ram >8. High Availability - Hormuzd >9. Security Considerations - Ram >10. References - Avri >11. Acknowledgments - All >Appendix >A. Implementation Notes - All? > >I will directly modify the text for my particular section and send it >out to the team/Avri on a per section or per-subsection basis. That was >we can all work in parallel. > >regards >Hormuzd > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jamal Hadi Salim [mailto:hadi@znyx.com] >Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 5:35 AM >To: forces-protocol@ietf.org >Cc: avri@psg.com; Khosravi, Hormuzd M; ram.gopal@nokia.com; Ligang Dong; >Weiming Wang; Robert Haas >Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? > >Avri must be on travel or tied up somewhere around the globe. >The latest i could find is: >http://psg.com/~avri/forces/draft/Archive-Forces-Protocol-02.zip > >Does anyone know if theres something newer or should we start here? >Hormuzd can you post that todo distribution? > >cheers, >jamal > >On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 19:23, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > > >>On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 11:07, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: >> >> >>>Now that we seem to have made progress on the basics.. >>>Avri, >>>Could you post a URL to the xml docs that we could start editing? >>>We could start with the TODO action items as posted by Hormuzd. >>> >>>cheers, >>>jamal >>> >>> >>_______________________________________________ >>Forces-protocol mailing list >>Forces-protocol@ietf.org >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol >> >> > > > > > -- Robert Haas IBM Zurich Research Laboratory Säumerstrasse 4 CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland phone +41-1-724-8698 fax +41-1-724-8578 http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~rha
_______________________________________________ Forces-protocol mailing list Forces-protocol@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
- Re: [Forces-protocol] protocol draft editing? Wang,Weiming
- RE: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] protocol draft editing? Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Jamal Hadi Salim
- RE: [Forces-protocol] protocol draft editing? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? avri
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing?… avri
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Robert Haas
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Ligang Dong
- [Forces-protocol] Applying changes to Section 6 (… Robert Haas
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Applying changes to Section… Jamal Hadi Salim
- RE: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- RE: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Robert Haas
- RE: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- RE: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? avri
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Ligang Dong
- RE: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- RE: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? ram.gopal
- RE: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: protocol draft editing? Ligang Dong