Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of theoptionsforLFB-levelmulticast]
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com> Mon, 08 November 2004 04:01 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA02423 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 23:01:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CR0j6-0004vD-Am for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 23:01:56 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CR0bg-0007ap-QM; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 22:54:16 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CR0Z7-00079y-Nw for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 22:51:37 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA01781 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 22:51:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from znx208-2-156-007.znyx.com ([208.2.156.7] helo=lotus.znyx.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CR0ZZ-0004jn-Gu for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 22:52:06 -0500
Received: from localhost ([208.2.156.2]) by lotus.znyx.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with ESMTP id 2004110719552454:13942 ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 19:55:24 -0800
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of theoptionsforLFB-levelmulticast]
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>
To: Weiming Wang <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
In-Reply-To: <00bd01c4c536$fb418ee0$020aa8c0@wwm1>
References: <4189F776.4080306@zurich.ibm.com> <1099700691.1038.2.camel@jzny.localdomain> <005101c4c408$dc341600$020aa8c0@wwm1> <1099752095.1037.11.camel@jzny.localdomain> <003201c4c46d$1bbce4a0$020aa8c0@wwm1><004201c4c4ec$61d34c20$020aa8c0@wwm1> <1099829057.2165.18.camel@jzny.localdomain> <00bd01c4c536$fb418ee0$020aa8c0@wwm1>
Organization: ZNYX Networks
Message-Id: <1099885892.2167.13.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 22:51:32 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Lotus/Znyx(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 11/07/2004 07:55:24 PM, Serialize by Router on Lotus/Znyx(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 11/07/2004 07:55:27 PM, Serialize complete at 11/07/2004 07:55:27 PM
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b4a0a5f5992e2a4954405484e7717d8c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, "(Ram Gopal )" <ram.gopal@nokia.com>, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>, forces-protocol@ietf.org, joel@STEVECROCKER.COM, Patrick Droz <dro@zurich.ibm.com>, David.Putzolu@intel.com, Dong Ligang <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hadi@znyx.com
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 92df29fa99cf13e554b84c8374345c17
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Weiming, On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 21:02, Weiming Wang wrote: > Jamal, > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com> > > > > Weiming, > > > > As i am reading your slides I cant to seem to see what the difference is > > with your scheme (vs what i would call "other"). Maybe we are just > > saying the same thing. > Firstly, I should say the index based path is fairly the same as you mentioned. > Only thing I just want to specifically mention is even in the index based path > scheme, the field ID also plays important role, and the field ID is different > from index (subscript). Is this the same as content based description in slide 23? Note that content based is under discussion > > > > Lets use your example to refer to set g1 to value of vg1: > > > > You say: > > AttrID2[i=1].f2[j=1].g1=vg1 > > > > Other scheme: > > Assuming table refered by AttrID2 has ID=2 and f2 has ID=2 and g1 has > > ID=1, then configuring g1 as you described is: > > [2,1,2,1,1]=vg1 > > > > Is your difference in how this is presented? i.e you seem to say: > > [2,[1]],[2,[1]],1 ? Did i get this right? > [Weiming]This expression is actually not important. The important is it should > contain f2 ID as well as indexes. Weiming, Isnt this f2 the same as #2 that i assumed above when i said "Assuming table refered by AttrID2 has ID=2 and f2 has ID=2 "? Maybe you are refering to a mixture of content and Ids? > > It seems to me that we are both saying that a vector, such as a table > > entry will have two or more "coordinates" (table,index) but a scalar > > such as what you refer to as AttrID1 will have a single entry. > [Weiming]Yes, this is another point I just want to say. By this, I just want to > say that index-based searching is not enough. We have to use field ID (content) > based searching. > Content based access is tabled under discussion in slide 23. > > > > Please respond as soon as you can because i am not sure what to say > > and i have asked around here and havent anyone who could point the > > difference. > Because it seems quite discussion topic and not very proper to be put in our > protocol presentation, therefore I just want to ask Robert to help to show it. > I still dont see what where we have differences. If Robert can see that difference i think it would be worth presenting it. cheers, jamal _______________________________________________ Forces-protocol mailing list Forces-protocol@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options… Robert Haas
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Robert Haas
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of theop… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of theop… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of theop… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation oftheopt… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation oftheopt… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation oftheopt… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentationoftheopti… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation oftheopt… Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] protcol slides Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Robert Haas
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Robert Haas
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Weiming Wang
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Weiming Wang
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Weiming Wang
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Jamal Hadi Salim