[Forces-protocol] Re: GET/SET in one msg ?

["Joel M. Halpern" <[e-mail]>]

I have two reactions:
1) Actually combining the two in the same request introduces all sorts of 
messy questions.
2) Most of the protocol design ought to be agnostic as to whether this is 
permitted or not.

I would probably tend to structure a protocol mechanism so that it was 
possible to do such a thing, and then add a behavior description that says 
that the results of such an operation are unpredictable.

Yours,
Joel

At 02:03 PM 10/15/2004 -0700, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>We (protocol team) are finalizing some of the msgs and one of the issues
>which is being discussed is whether GET/SET operation need to be
>combined in a single msg...(currently we have them as separate msgs). I
>have never seen this being done in practice i.e. command bundling of
>GET/SET, but if you guys have some experience/opinions on this, pls do
>let us know.
>
>
>Thanks a lot,
>Hormuzd


_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol