Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback on section 6.5

"Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn> Sun, 24 October 2004 12:34 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA24068 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:34:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLhnD-0005Ej-Ad for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:48:15 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLhW6-0005KP-Dy; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:30:34 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLhSV-0004wq-6S for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:26:51 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA23699 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:26:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=202.96.99.56) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLhfg-00056Z-Ms for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 08:40:32 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 99432.341813895; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:45:00 +0800 (CST)
Received: from WWM (unverified [202.96.99.60]) by mail.gsu.cn (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.0.11) with ESMTP id <B0000087221@mail.gsu.cn>; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:20:51 +0800
Message-ID: <131601c4b9c4$31934480$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn>
From: "Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
To: <hadi@znyx.com>, <avri@psg.com>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02579210@orsmsx408><1E526654-24BF-11D9-9DB1-000393CC2112@psg.com><417A23E6.7010504@zurich.ibm.com> <005b01c4b907$242b1790$020aa8c0@wwm1><417AA8B6.1040601@zurich.ibm.com><1098558745.1097.42.camel@jzny.localdomain><CE5A3946-252D-11D9-9DB1-000393CC2112@psg.com><1098563810.1096.93.camel@jzny.localdomain> <1098565348.1255.120.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback on section 6.5
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:22:56 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, ram.gopal@nokia.com, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aafa0432175920a4b3e118e16c5cb64

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com>
> - 6.5  Event Notification and Response Messages
>
> "An event definition
>    made by ForCES protocol, ForCES FE model, or by vendors will state if
>    the event needs subscription or not."
>
> Events will be defined in the XML as attributes; i.e they will have a
> path to them that can be used by the config message to subscribe to.
> I think it is important to at least say that.
[Weiming]OK. Avri, pls help to add this. Thanks.

>
> - 6.5.1  Event Notification Message
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> |    Type = REPORT              |               Length          |
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> |                        Path(or Event ID?)                     |
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> |                            Event Data                         |
> .                                                               .
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
> Should be:
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> |    OPER = REPORT              |               Length          |
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> |                        Path and  Data                         |
> .                                                               .
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
[Weiming]Do you think the "path' and the 'data' will be mixed?

>
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forces-protocol mailing list
> Forces-protocol@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol



_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol