IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?

Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com> Sat, 16 October 2004 04:30 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA06479 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:30:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CIgOp-00064G-FX for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:42:36 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CIg99-0000AS-UN; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:26:23 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CIg7f-0007sq-2B for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:24:51 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA06133 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:24:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from server26.totalchoicehosting.com ([209.152.177.32]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CIgJ9-0005x2-8K for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:36:44 -0400
Received: from cpe-024-211-225-015.nc.rr.com ([24.211.225.15]) by server26.totalchoicehosting.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CIg6y-0004KC-7l; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:24:08 -0400
Subject: RE: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?
From: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
To: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02E985A6@orsmsx408>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02E985A6@orsmsx408>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1097900642.19064.13.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 (1.4.5-7)
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:24:03 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server26.totalchoicehosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - petri-meat.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ram.gopal@nokia.com, zsolt@petri-meat.com, "Yang, Lily L" <lily.l.yang@intel.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jhalpern@MEGISTO.com>, forces-protocol@ietf.org, hadi@znyx.com, Alan DeKok <alan.dekok@idt.com>, "Deleganes, Ellen M" <ellen.m.deleganes@intel.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 21:26, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote:

> Does anyone else have an opinion on this, especially if it is different
> from what Joel suggested ?
> Pls do let us know asap. 
> 
> I am fine with this, just want to make sure there are no contradicting
> opinions in the Model team.

My problem about allowing a config command in the same PL-message as a
query command (and I think Zsolt agrees with me), is that it complicates
handling of any responses.  I believe that, for any PL message with
config commands, all of the possible exception responses can fit into
a single PL message, and therefore we can correlate at the PL layer.
However, it could be typical that a small query command message could
result in several PL messages being returned (e.g., GET an entire
table).

For simplicity, I would like to see PL messages typed as either
CONFIG-REQUEST, CONFIG-RESPONSE, QUERY-REQUEST, QUERY-RESPONSE,
ASYNC-EVENT, ...


Regards,

// Steve		http://www.petri-meat.com/slblake/


_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email