Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8

avri@psg.com Tue, 26 October 2004 00:22 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23821 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:22:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMFKc-0005af-W1 for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:36:59 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMF1X-0004km-Jx; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:17:15 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMExX-0002m8-ST for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:13:08 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23004 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:13:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: avri@psg.com
Received: from tla.crepundia.net ([194.71.127.149] helo=report.tla-group.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMFB5-0005OR-U0 for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:27:08 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (report.tla-group.com [194.71.127.149]) by report.tla-group.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i9PNmJep002920; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:48:20 +0200
In-Reply-To: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0302DC3C@orsmsx408>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0302DC3C@orsmsx408>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <CD1B278E-26E3-11D9-9DB1-000393CC2112@psg.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:13:02 -0400
To: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ram.gopal@nokia.com, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, forces-protocol@ietf.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>, "Wang, Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 25 okt 2004, at 16.33, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote:

> This is fine for now but I would prefer the Authors Addresses being a
> separate section rather than part of the Appendix cause that is how I
> have seen it in most RFCs including All the ForCES RFCs.

the problem with what is currently possible is that it came before the 
references when the regular authors section came after.

i would probably have to hack at xml2rfc to make it work.  but i still 
think it is against the rules proper - even if you got away with it on 
the requirements.

a.


_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol