IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?

"Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn> Fri, 22 October 2004 02:54 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA04803 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:54:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKpmM-0003X4-6U for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 23:07:46 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CKpWp-0000Su-2m; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:51:43 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CKpFD-0003cW-Dv for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:33:31 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA02877 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:33:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=202.96.99.56) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKpRr-00038b-Ba for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:46:40 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 99432.341813895; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:50:54 +0800 (CST)
Received: from WWM (unverified [202.96.99.60]) by mail.gsu.cn (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.0.11) with ESMTP id <B0000084841@mail.gsu.cn>; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:27:17 +0800
Message-ID: <0ee501c4b7de$f24000c0$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn>
From: "Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
To: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E025791E9@orsmsx408><04ab01c4b5c7$1332c430$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn><417573E8.7070502@zurich.ibm.com> <1098385216.2340.239.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:29:24 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, ram.gopal@nokia.com, Zsolt Haraszti <zsolt@nc.rr.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jhalpern@MEGISTO.com>, hadi@znyx.com, forces-protocol@ietf.org, Alan DeKok <alan.dekok@idt.com>, "Deleganes, Ellen M" <ellen.m.deleganes@intel.com>, "Yang, Lily L" <lily.l.yang@intel.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Blake" <slblake@petri-meat.com>
>
> > To cover the case of a list of LFB Instances (reminds me of xcast ;-)
> > we can modify the LFBSelect TLV as follows:
> > main hdr (eg type = config)|
> > +--- T = LFBselect
> >      |        |
> >      |        +-- LFBCLASSID = target LFB class
> >      |        |
> >      |        |
> >      |        +-- one more LFBInstance(s) = target LFB instance(s).
> >                   [the size of this TLV tells how long the list is]
>
> I'm not sure this is needed.  If we have multiple LFB instances of a
> certain class on an FE sharing configuration data, I would like to see
> that explicitly represented in the model (a todo from the August IETF
> that I haven't followed through on yet), rather than xcast'ing config
> messages.
I can not catch any idea on how a model can do this, could you present more on
this?

Thanks.
Weiming
>
>
> Regards,
>
> // Steve




_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email