Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-forces-model-11.txt]

Ligang Dong(董黎刚) <donglg@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn> Tue, 26 February 2008 00:12 UTC

Message-Id: <TUE.26.FEB.2008.081221.0800.>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:12:21 +0800 <donglg@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn>
From: =?utf-8?B?TGlnYW5nIERvbmco6JGj6buO5YiaKQ==?= <donglg@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-forces-model-11.txt]
Comments: To: "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

Joel, 
It seems that you miss my comments, do not you?
Ligang
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com>
To: <FORCES@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 5:07 AM
Subject: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-forces-model-11.txt]


> Here is the revision to the ForCES model draft.  It addresses all 
> received comments to the best of my ability.
> Once the Protocol document is also ready, I would ask the chairs to 
> deliver both documents to the AD for IETF last call.
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> PS: Did folks see the Juniper JCS 1200 announcement?
> 
---------------------------------------------

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ligang Dong(董黎刚)" <donglg@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>om>; <hadi@znyx.com>
Cc: "Avri Doria" <avri@acm.org>rg>; "Weiming Wang" <wmwang@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn>cn>; "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>om>; "Robert Haas" <rha@zurich.ibm.com>om>; "Ram Gopal" <ram.gopal@nokia.com>om>; "David Putzolu" <david.putzolu@intel.com>om>; "Patrick Droz" <dro@zurich.ibm.com>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 9:37 AM
Subject: suggestion about Model Draft


> hi, Joel,
> 
> The following are my suggestion for the model draft.
> (1) In page 8, “This document uses XML Schema to define the structure of the LFB Library documents, as defined in [8] and [9] and [10]. ”should be “This document uses XML Schema to define the structure of the LFB Library documents, as defined in [8], [9] and [10]. ”
> (2)The concept of "ForCES model" is not very clear in this draft. For example, (page 9)“The ForCES model includes the constructions for defining the class of logical function blocks (LFBS) that an FE may support.”
> Here, "ForCES model" should be "FE model"?
> 
> best regards
> Ligang
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com>
> To: <FORCES@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 1:14 AM
> Subject: Model draft
> 
> 
>> Since the working group page has not updated yet, here:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-model-10.txt
>> 
>> is the link to the revised model draft.
>> If no one objects soon, I will ask the chairs to perform another working 
>> group last call to see if we are finally done.
>> 
>> Yours,
>> Joel M. Halpern
>>