[forces] I-D Action: draft-ietf-forces-lfb-subsidiary-management-00.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu, 26 February 2015 13:26 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20F21A00FE; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 05:26:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38BoLvuKoEsd; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 05:25:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20E01A00E0; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 05:25:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.12.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150226132559.11526.88936.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 05:25:59 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/forces/9JQVSzS6B0Cyp76fG87kOs8oZKY>
Cc: forces@ietf.org
Subject: [forces] I-D Action: draft-ietf-forces-lfb-subsidiary-management-00.txt
X-BeenThere: forces@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: ForCES WG mailing list <forces.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/forces/>
List-Post: <mailto:forces@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:26:01 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Forwarding and Control Element Separation Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IETF ForCES Logical Function Block (LFB) Subsidiary Management
Authors : Bhumip Khasnabish
Evangelos Haleplidis
Jamal Hadi Salim
Filename : draft-ietf-forces-lfb-subsidiary-management-00.txt
Pages : 20
Date : 2015-02-25
Abstract:
Deployment experience has demonstrated the value of using the
Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) architecture to
manage resources other than packet forwarding. In that spirit, the
Forwarding Element Manager (FEM) is modelled by creating a Logical
Functional Block (LFB) to represent its functionality. We refer to
this LFB as the FE Configuration (FEC) LFB. A Control Element (CE)
that controls a Forwarding Element's (FE) resources can also manage
its configuration via the FEC LFB. This document introduces the FEC
LFB, an LFB that specifies the configuration parameters of an FE.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-forces-lfb-subsidiary-management/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-forces-lfb-subsidiary-management-00
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [forces] I-D Action: draft-ietf-forces-lfb-subsid… internet-drafts