IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [forces] Adoption of ForCES Inter-FE LFB draft-joachimpillai-forces-interfelfb

"Haleplidis Evangelos" <ehalep@gmail.com> Wed, 17 December 2014 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ehalep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3E61A0127 for <forces@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:52:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q9QE3qnPUkdE for <forces@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:52:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 254261A000A for <forces@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:52:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l18so69307wgh.2 for <forces@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:52:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=z8zCXxC3sn05x8nnjuy7FLD7W7bA++8jZrdvoiQuQws=; b=xGB5gzcihBGHoL4rcDc0W7SbIQI+d8d1/dglCWIjCaz9Q1YOcBnMPcOZBtXMHv6j1R /Xleq/QU9VWfb2PIR4r4WCvalDKu4lRcIuzgw8gKlzEX1fKPfG/A+Mi170nfroWQebIV kQ2HBfb8YXGXG4xV2rSqRaI4UTPKSYW9PyACPkVOwd315MARuAxTGusBiz+oxTlU5kY5 6Cg0MOqblIpmRIRS5vSaPbCcbBVlL79yTIg2U1L6bIiKDuyTn8+pULX7OZuLAoTjU+TZ 93Trz2nF4OYjiTsZ4oyhxd8QD2+kmQOdHkVh3j+YocVuT6DNTUNu84jRQ+FRPdq4IOWF VkJw==
X-Received: by 10.180.85.4 with SMTP id d4mr18567528wiz.36.1418856745903; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:52:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EhalepXPS (ppp079166045129.access.hol.gr. [79.166.45.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u13sm3920705wjr.26.2014.12.17.14.52.23 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:52:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Haleplidis Evangelos <ehalep@gmail.com>
To: forces@ietf.org
References: <CAAFAkD8o9m5AeOLw=sszyeqsDSjCiFUgXFspbwbejOwYqgabwg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAFAkD8o9m5AeOLw=sszyeqsDSjCiFUgXFspbwbejOwYqgabwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:52:24 +0200
Message-ID: <00f701d01a4c$2116bf80$63443e80$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdAUh1Oh2XIMQ6vJTT+zeR1/hpA08gAuxIeQ
Content-Language: el
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/forces/EL_P-V817Ton-OLM7rbQCF2yPgA
Subject: Re: [forces] Adoption of ForCES Inter-FE LFB draft-joachimpillai-forces-interfelfb
X-BeenThere: forces@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ForCES WG mailing list <forces.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/forces/>
List-Post: <mailto:forces@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 22:52:29 -0000

Greetings to the list,

I have read and support the adoption of this as a working group document.
I have the following comments which are mostly editorial:

1. Please change the abstract to describe what the document is all about.
Currently the abstract discusses the main ForCES concept and that this is a
charter item. It needs to be changed to explicitly express the gist of the
document.

2. There are a couple of spelling errors. You can use the spell checker
(https://tools.ietf.org/tools/idspell/webservice).

3. Please change (or remove) this line: "The new ForCES charter allows the
LFB links in a topology to be across multiple FE (inter-FE connectivity)." 

4. You should possibly discuss what will happen when two IFE LFBs under a
different master that will set the IFETYPE component. Since the ethertype is
the only way you can identify this kind of message, you might want to say
that it must be the same to both ends. Unless you want to limit this
document to LFBs under one master. Following on that, while you specify the
IFETYPE on the egress, you don't have a way to say what ethertype you're
expecting. Also, what will happen if you set an ethertype on an already
reserved one? Should you also have a PreviousFE component? 

5. Is it possible that you can have multiple connections between two
InterLFBs? Should this be limited to one?

Regards,
Evangelos.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: forces [mailto:forces-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jamal Hadi
> Salim
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:41 PM
> To: forces@ietf.org
> Subject: [forces] Adoption of ForCES Inter-FE LFB draft-joachimpillai-
> forces-interfelfb
> 
> This is a re-initialized call for adoption.
> As per last meeting discussion and charter requirements
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-joachimpillai-forces-interfelfb
> as the WG document for the inter FE chartered work.
> 
> If there are any objections or suggestions please raise them on the
> list (dont send me or DJ private email).
> Silence implies consent.
> 
> The initial call for adoption was withdrawn because we wanted to make
> sure we can get the code sane to the proposed ideas.
> We have achieved that goal at this point.
> 
> cheers,
> jamal
> 
> _______________________________________________
> forces mailing list
> forces@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email