Re: Model Draft - Property
"tom.petch" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Thu, 14 February 2008 17:02 UTC
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:02:57 +0100
From: "tom.petch" <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Model Draft - Property
Comments: To: Patrick Droz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
One other thought, unrelated to my other two posts. I suggest adding 'Property' to the 'Definitions'. The word is given a specific technical meaning here, somewhat distinct from common usage, so you might consider adding: Property -- components have properties associated with them, readability, writability, length of string, event threshold and such like. Some of these properties may in turn be writable by the CE. Properties are discussed in more detail in section 4.8 Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Droz" <email@example.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 2:48 PM Subject: Re: Model Draft > Dear WG members, > > I would like to initiate WG LC on the model draft. The LC will end on > February 15th well enough to make the cut for the forthcoming IETF. > Please to take the chance for last comments. > > Thanks, > Patrick > > Joel M. Halpern wrote: > > Well, since no one seems to object ... > > > > Chairs, this is a formal request for a last call to complete work on the > > Forces Model draft, > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-model-10.txt > > > > Thank you, > > Joel M. Halpern > > > > > > > > > > -- > Dr. Patrick Droz | firstname.lastname@example.org > IBM Zurich Research Laboratory | http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~dro > Saumerstrasse 4 | Tel. +41-44-724-85-25 > CH-8803 Rueschlikon/Switzerland | Fax. +41-44-724-85-78 > >