Re: [forces] Adoption of ForCES Inter-FE LFB draft-joachimpillai-forces-interfelfb

I support adoption of this document by the working group.  The issue 
addressed is real, and suitable for IETF standardization.  The 
mechanisms described seems appropriate to the task.

Once adopted, as Evangelos suggested, the working group should decide 
how to handle the case of inter-FE with the FEs controlled by different 
CEs.  I see two choices, either of which is reasonable.  We can declare 
that the scope is only inter-FE under control of a single CE, or we can 
declare that if there are two CEs they must agree out-of-band on the IDs 
for metadata.  (The one solution I would like to avoid is specifying a 
metadata rewrite function to transform the IDs at the border.)

Yours,
Joel

On 12/10/14 9:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> This is a re-initialized call for adoption.
> As per last meeting discussion and charter requirements
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-joachimpillai-forces-interfelfb
> as the WG document for the inter FE chartered work.
>
> If there are any objections or suggestions please raise them
> on the list (dont send me or DJ private email).
> Silence implies consent.
>
> The initial call for adoption was withdrawn because we wanted
> to make sure we can get the code sane to the proposed ideas.
> We have achieved that goal at this point.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
> _______________________________________________
> forces mailing list
> forces@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces
>