Re: [forces] Adoption of ForCES Inter-FE LFB draft-joachimpillai-forces-interfelfb

That seems a good resolution to me.  Thank you.
Joel

On 1/4/15 8:01 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> The intent is to use IANA ForCES metadata definitions. So at least
> for those it is clear there will be no conflict.
> The IANA definition does allow for private definitions which could be
> used; in such a case the synchronization is really out of scope.
> IOW, this issue has to do with CE-CE synchronization more than this
> LFB. I have added text to indicate that if we had a cluster of CEs
> controlling FEs, then it is expected they will synchronize their
> values.
>
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Joel <joel@stevecrocker.com> wrote:
>> I support adoption of this document by the working group.  The issue
>> addressed is real, and suitable for IETF standardization.  The mechanisms
>> described seems appropriate to the task.
>>
>> Once adopted, as Evangelos suggested, the working group should decide how to
>> handle the case of inter-FE with the FEs controlled by different CEs.  I see
>> two choices, either of which is reasonable.  We can declare that the scope
>> is only inter-FE under control of a single CE, or we can declare that if
>> there are two CEs they must agree out-of-band on the IDs for metadata.  (The
>> one solution I would like to avoid is specifying a metadata rewrite function
>> to transform the IDs at the border.)
>>
>> Yours,
>> Joel
>>
>> On 12/10/14 9:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a re-initialized call for adoption.
>>> As per last meeting discussion and charter requirements
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-joachimpillai-forces-interfelfb
>>> as the WG document for the inter FE chartered work.
>>>
>>> If there are any objections or suggestions please raise them
>>> on the list (dont send me or DJ private email).
>>> Silence implies consent.
>>>
>>> The initial call for adoption was withdrawn because we wanted
>>> to make sure we can get the code sane to the proposed ideas.
>>> We have achieved that goal at this point.
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> jamal
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forces mailing list
>>> forces@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces
>>>
>>