Re: minutes and slides uploaded

"Wang,Weiming" <wmwang2001@hotmail.com> Fri, 21 November 2008 09:28 UTC

Message-Id: <FRI.21.NOV.2008.172805.0800.>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:28:05 +0800
From: "Wang,Weiming" <wmwang2001@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: minutes and slides uploaded
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

I'm not very familiar with all IETF conventions, but I just think it should be the same for I-D process in a WG,  regardless of the authors are themthelves the WG chair or not. 

thanks,
Weiming

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wang,Weiming" <wmwang2001@hotmail.com>

> Dear Chairs,
> 
> A question is always surrounding me. 
> 
> Before the WG chairs was adjusted in 2007, we had quite discussions on the TMLs we may adopt, including TCP/TCP, TCP/UDP, SCTP. We never had a cousencus on the question. 
> 
> While since someday in 2007 after the WG chair changed, the SCTP TML draft suddenly became the WG document.
> 
> My question is, 
> . via which process this happened?
> . and how much have you got agreement on this TML?
> 
> thanks,
> Weiming
> 
> From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@mojatatu.com>
> 
>>I have uploaded the minutes and slides from Tuesdays meeting on the IETF
>> website.
>> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/minutes/forces.txt
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/slides/forces-0.pdf
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/slides/forces-1.pdf
>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/slides/forces-2.pdf
>> 
>> cheers,
>> jamal