IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IP and frame relay

Philippe Prindeville <prindevi@inria.inria.fr> Thu, 15 November 1990 21:50 UTC

Received: from inria.inria.fr by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12771; 15 Nov 90 16:50 EST
Received: by inria.inria.fr (5.65+/90.0.9) via Fnet-EUnet id AA19904; Thu, 15 Nov 90 22:49:29 +0100 (MET)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 1990 22:49:29 +0100
From: Philippe Prindeville <prindevi@inria.inria.fr>
Message-Id: <9011152149.AA19904@inria.inria.fr>
To: hinden@bbn.com
Subject: Re: IP and frame relay
Cc: frame-relay@NRI.Reston.VA.US, iplpdn@NRI.Reston.VA.US, meritec!clapp@bellcore.bellcore.com, smds@NRI.Reston.VA.US

Does anyone worry (besides me) that we might be having an explosion of
working groups here?  There is an IP over SMDS working group --
doesn't this conflict with IP over Large Pub. Data networks?

And if not, then shouldn't frame-relay do its own encapsulation for
similar reasons?

Concerned, but not yet panicking,

-Philip

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email