List merging?
Kent England <kwe@buitb.bu.edu> Wed, 14 November 1990 22:57 UTC
Received: from bu.edu by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13919; 14 Nov 90 17:57 EST
Received: from BU-IT.BU.EDU by BU.EDU (1.99) Wed, 14 Nov 90 17:55:03 EST
Received: from BUITB.BU.EDU by bu-it.bu.edu (12/20/89); Wed, 14 Nov 90 11:52:19 EST
Received: from buit13.bu.edu. (buit13.bu.edu.ARPA) by buitb (4.12/4.7) id AA01824; Wed, 14 Nov 90 11:52:20 est
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 1990 11:52:20 -0500
From: Kent England <kwe@buitb.bu.edu>
Message-Id: <9011141652.AA01824@buitb>
To: frame-relay@NRI.Reston.VA.US, smds@NRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: List merging?
Cc: iplpdn@NRI.Reston.VA.US
Given the announcement of the iplpdn working group and list, should we continue the separate smds and frame-relay lists? Would it make sense to merge these lists into iplpdn by just redirecting the traffic to iplpdn and telling people to subscribe to iplpdn? I suppose it is too late to make "iplpdn" more mnemonic. I have a devil of a time spelling this correctly. I also can't figure out how to pronounce it; would "ip-lip-din" sound OK? (all short i's.) Perhaps we just leave that to Phill Gross? :-) --Kent
- List merging? Kent England
- List merging? Juha Heinanen
- Re: List merging? Frank Kastenholz
- Re: List merging? Phillip G. Gross
- Re: List merging? Greg Vaudreuil
- Re: List merging? John Loiacono
- Re: List merging? Philippe Prindeville
- Re: List merging? Dan Lynch