Re: Protocols over Frame Relay

tmallory@bbn.com Mon, 19 November 1990 19:59 UTC

Received: from SALAD.BBN.COM by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa29644; 19 Nov 90 14:59 EST
To: frame-relay@NRI.Reston.VA.US
cc: tmallory@bbn.com
Subject: Re: Protocols over Frame Relay
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 19 Nov 90 09:42:04 -0800. <9011191742.AA04267@buckeye.ESD.3Com.COM>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 1990 14:59:04 -0500
From: tmallory@bbn.com
Message-ID: <9011191500.aa29644@NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US>

Another comment, this time on the OSPF model for handling point-to-point type
nets.  There are definite problems with scaling a designated multicast server
to suport large numbers of hosts on a single network.  The designated
server(and backup server) may end up as bottlenecks: imagine redistributing a
"multicast" message to 1000 hosts.  For 10-50 hosts it is probably just fine.

Tracy

Protocols over Frame Relay Joel Halpern
Protocols over Frame Relay Fred Baker
Re: Protocols over Frame Relay Drew Daniel Perkins
Re: Protocols over Frame Relay Joel Halpern
Re: Protocols over Frame Relay Philippe Prindeville
Re: Protocols over Frame Relay Drew Daniel Perkins
Re: Protocols over Frame Relay Philippe Prindeville
Re: Protocols over Frame Relay k1io@FN42jk 16-Nov-1990 0944
Protocols over Frame Relay Juha Heinanen
Protocols over Frame Relay Dino Farinacci
Re: Protocols over Frame Relay tmallory
Protocols over Frame Relay Dino Farinacci
Re: Protocols over Frame Relay tmallory
Re: Protocols over Frame Relay Philippe Prindeville