Re: Frame relay access architecture

Tom Daly <daly@cisco.com> Fri, 05 October 1990 20:41 UTC

Received: from wolf.cisco.com by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12574; 5 Oct 90 16:41 EDT
Received: from dustbin.cisco.com by wolf.cisco.com with TCP; Fri, 5 Oct 90 13:36:42 -0700
To: Sonu Mirchandani <sxmirch@sysengr.pacbell.com>
Cc: frame-relay@NRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Frame relay access architecture
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 Oct 90 12:43:00 PDT." <9010051943.AA04748@tahiti.sysengr.PacBell.COM>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 1990 13:39:46 -0600
From: Tom Daly <daly@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <9010051641.aa12574@NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US>
Status: OR

>> 
>> Does anyone know how are they offering FR ? Is it with
>> ISDN Q.931 or under X.25 or IP over FR ?
>> 
>> 
>> sonu
>> smir@pacbell.com

I guess it depends upon who 'they' are.  The original intent
was to use Q.931 extensions to set up frame-relay calls in an ISDN
environment, though I don't know of any working implementations.

The current reality is that Stratacom's implementation is administratively
configured, and the cisco is configured with matching DLCI maps.

Tom Daly
cisco Systems, Inc.
daly@cisco.com

Frame relay access architecture Sonu Mirchandani
Re: Frame relay access architecture Tom Daly
Re: Frame relay access architecture Kent England
Frame relay access architecture Juha Heinanen