Re: [ftpext] WG Action: FTP Extensions, 2nd edition (ftpext2)

[Tony Hansen <[e-mail]>]

On 11/23/2010 4:17 PM, Anthony Bryan wrote:
> so, wow, looks like things are rolling along! :)
>
> as you can see, our WG got approved last Thursday.
>
> I'm very happy to see comments on
> draft-peterson-streamlined-ftp-command-extensions still coming in.
> please chime in if you haven't already.
>
> I'm new to this, so I wonder what the first order of business is?
>
> here are some ideas:
>
> 1) we have 4 drafts on the charter, 3 of which are "active" (John
> hasn't updated draft-klensin-ftp-typeu yet). once these are submitted
> with the string '-ftpext2-' in the
> draft name, they will show up at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ftpext2/
>
> I think our ID draft-bryan-ftp-hash becomes ietf-ftpext2-hash then? (&
> the others follow in a similar fashion).

When the next update is ready for each draft, each author should upload 
the draft under the WG name. Bryan's naming suggestion is apropos:

draft-bryan-ftp-hash => draft-ietf-ftpext2-hash
draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftp-hosts => draft-ietf-ftpext2-hosts
draft-klensin-ftp-typeu => draft-ietf-ftpext2-typeu

John, since yours is long expired, it would be useful if you just upload 
it under the new name so people can start commenting on it.

> should this be done now? we should change the WG at the top of our
> drafts I guess. how is this done in xml2rfc? is there anything else
> that needs to be changed?
This is optional: it is done by using the <workgroup> element in the 
<front> matter.

     Tony Hansen
     [e-mail]