IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ftpext] COMB command IETF draft proposal

Richard Koenning <Richard.Koenning@ts.fujitsu.com> Thu, 16 June 2011 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Richard.Koenning@ts.fujitsu.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4165C11E811B for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2GvlAEfwf74I for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dgate10.ts.fujitsu.com (dgate10.ts.fujitsu.com [80.70.172.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4402E11E8118 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: s=s1536a; d=ts.fujitsu.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-SBRSScore:X-IronPort-AV:Received:X-IronPort-AV: Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Organization: User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=TlQLotC8PNSgWWPDh/R45QuZtSnChMZ6ePCMDKjk0YS1/u4TIpmDWe7u yNWf0qAKL74PdyV3afnvvYB8Z/eWaRgi4SpfTeYZ5KNceMMSTKC2cO6B0 7dz2wbhiIHGFz0GB29HI4bpxWUFhz3hg6Az3CKM5RXaw0d0wHvsdF5WoQ fcUU+Jdp4WjWgGEXy32E1aPoPIlaJelEMt/0tR0BnZ7Wxj2tztsni7Eoz mGan4YJ6zmKnDJ7RzevuV4VVrVJRb;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ts.fujitsu.com; i=Richard.Koenning@ts.fujitsu.com; q=dns/txt; s=s1536b; t=1308243905; x=1339779905; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uqCsQjavzyY5FGG5yW4jKHWJv0O/1KDA1EkqDyLKY9s=; b=jXC6C8MoWQF+EZ0rOsgGmm2q67X1HPlSY5eCNIf1KrlEZpqmxeMHNlbK a1dVWKpMQ6Wc1mUrkvLad5aonzub0o2x6RrhRfT0qRpXeIya6H+dInus9 Fo1oi97i1DusFXV1cxOXnwf/su9dNvhMTam0uV+hIYZl00Jt6jfpU/tSc 6wAk6gX1+dFXZZsia3fDfwgYm5lmJz7Gm9yeUo7wGUIl9Lnfp8J/Omwx5 ZJ5vcUQdOU8e0YIpuWFJJQvI1mex7;
X-SBRSScore: None
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,375,1304287200"; d="scan'208";a="79878705"
Received: from abgdgate40u.abg.fsc.net ([172.25.138.90]) by dgate10u.abg.fsc.net with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2011 19:05:01 +0200
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,375,1304287200"; d="scan'208";a="115342214"
Received: from mch8469d.mch.fsc.net (HELO [172.25.52.240]) ([172.25.52.240]) by abgdgate40u.abg.fsc.net with ESMTP; 16 Jun 2011 19:05:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4DFA37BC.8030002@ts.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:05:00 +0200
From: Richard Koenning <Richard.Koenning@ts.fujitsu.com>
Organization: Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: de, de-nds, en, en-US, it
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ftpext@ietf.org" <ftpext@ietf.org>
References: <F15941D3C8A2D54D92B341C20CACDF2311AC408AB1@exchange> <01AA9EC92749BF4894AC2B3039EA4A2C1946D58A@CH1PRD0302MB131.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <F15941D3C8A2D54D92B341C20CACDF2311AC51B359@exchange> <BANLkTina+ZF97cgQrJp7yGWcsWmY4eOuEQ@mail.gmail.com> <F15941D3C8A2D54D92B341C20CACDF2311AC51B3C4@exchange> <4DF07777.2010205@kimmeringer.de> <4DF0E42F.1000104@ts.fujitsu.com> <4DF11952.6060601@kimmeringer.de> <F15941D3C8A2D54D92B341C20CACDF2311AC51B725@exchange> <4DF14059.9080709@kimmeringer.de> <F15941D3C8A2D54D92B341C20CACDF2311AC51B892@exchange> <4DF216F9.5000205@ts.fujitsu.com> <4DFA31D3.9010006@kimmeringer.de>
In-Reply-To: <4DFA31D3.9010006@kimmeringer.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [ftpext] COMB command IETF draft proposal
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Richard.Koenning@ts.fujitsu.com
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:05:05 -0000

Well, at the first look it seems a little bit like rape of RFC 959, but 
currently i don't know anything which would speak against this solution.
Best regards,
Richard Könning

Lothar Kimmeringer wrote:

> Am 10.06.2011 15:07, schrieb Richard Koenning:
> 
>>As Van Glass already pointed out in an answer to his own similar
> 
>  > proposal only one 1yz message is allowed per command (see RFC 959,
>  > p.37). Even when RFC 959 is not engraved into stone one should
>  > think twice before violating/changing rules layed down in this RFC.
> 
> There is a different between Van Glass' proposal and mine:
> 
> Van Flass:
> C> COMB "dest" "part1" "part2"
> S> 1XX part1 complete
> S> 1XX part2 complete
> 
> Mine:
> 
> C: COMB filea fileb filec
> S: 150-Start COMB
>     150-COMB for filea finished
>     150-COMB for fileb finished
>     150-COMB for filec finished
>     150 COMB finished
>     250 COMB command successful
> 
> In my example there is only one 150-response seperated into
> more than one lines.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Lothar Kimmeringer


-- 
Dr. Richard W. Könning
Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH, TSP ES&S SWE OS 5
Phone/Fax: +49-89-3222-2927 / -3222-329-2927
E-Mail: Richard.Koenning@ts.fujitsu.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email