Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts

liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com> Thu, 21 October 2010 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <maxpassion@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671983A69C7 for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.479
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.479 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cWL1lavJDwpd for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57953A686D for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyc15 with SMTP id 15so2886617gyc.31 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0YE1trwJB9sf2Uy9vHPrAGUxmC3WOaIT3O864D0t0K4=; b=XjAGS216jTu54lBnV0B8Df0KuBX5KrmUKsZ8zjGwMmMUlHsZHczWuH5tINIOBCYitQ IERvuaokNvjQfz7mDBHKHYtdBjdP9J5oiGtKz4pNYUuqDvtNhAnAmPFYQNPk2yb6Tsrk cbaxmdTUslKxgu7f6/6OZ8AQAVDjV5vXNjlyw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=IovlYwdTP/V2mB8bTqhK4v8IPX5sRcmxqtLVOocfJ3Xm8SXoqaA6w9uvGjziZ1kR40 7nXZOyLfd11irl1G3R+s6ZMwmjOT5Rn196REwRPLhEXmHzjKXm0wCW3PcOP6fcBJ91it CiCq+nUbaCMqAW6R0pcsd31+2M2pXcqucHILU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.230.193 with SMTP id jn1mr319555icb.257.1287649598386; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.10.211 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimFkMmNnpAWWwx9xmJzGoJCHAwqvMrOMoZ-bHZ+@mail.gmail.com>
References: <A5FC996C3C37DC4DA5076F1046B5674C431FD205@TK5EX14MBXC127.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010171017300.14040@iskra.ottix.net> <AANLkTimFkMmNnpAWWwx9xmJzGoJCHAwqvMrOMoZ-bHZ+@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:26:38 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimu0M6BgMTXkgxyTkXD2fYAGQ6eqGZUgNqe7mLi@mail.gmail.com>
From: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
To: Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Robert McMurray <robmcm@microsoft.com>, "ftpext@ietf.org" <ftpext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:25:06 -0000

Hi Anthony,

Thanks for posting the draft charter, just have one comment:

The  WG's specification deliverables include "A document that
specifies FTP extensions to support IPv4/IPv6 translation scenario"
but there is no corresponding Goals and Milestones?

Best regards,
Dapeng Liu

2010/10/18, Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>:
> I think the problem is that there isn't a FTPEXT WG yet & it doesn't
> seem definite that there will be one.
>
> I've been posting a draft charter (included here) but...not sure what
> the next step is.
>
> I added draft-liu-ftp64-extension, which I just saw turn up.
>
> somewhat on topic, does anyone know how to change the WG in xml2rfc?
>
>
>
> FTP Extensions, 2nd edition (ftpext2) Charter
>
> Chair(s):
>      TBD
>
> IETF Area:
>      Applications Area
>
> Applications Area Directors:
>      Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
>      Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
>
> Responsible Area Director:
>      Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
>
> Mailing list:
>      General Discussion: ftpext@ietf.org
>      Archive:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext/current/maillist.html
>
> Description of Working Group:
>
> The Standard File Transfer Protocol specification in RFC 959
> has been updated several times with command extensions of one
> sort or another, including those based on the extension
> mechanism of RFC 2389 (a complete list appears in RFC 5797 and
> the corresponding IANA registry at
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ftp-commands-extensions/ftp-commands-extensions.xhtml
> ).
>
> The following are active FTP related drafts:
>
>     draft-bryan-ftp-hash
>     draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftp-hosts
>     draft-liu-ftp64-extension
>     draft-peterson-streamlined-ftp-command-extensions
>     draft-preston-ftpext-deflate
>
> The Working Group will:
> * Review and finalize drafts listed above.
> * Continue work on other drafts that are already in progress.
> * Review and confirm or reject errata of current FTP RFCs.
> * Investigate the differences between FTP in theory
>   (current RFCs) and practice, and recommend future work to align them.
>
> The Working Group's specification deliverables are:
> * A document that specifies the HOST command (Proposed Standard).
> * A document that specifies the HASH command (Proposed Standard).
> * A document that specifies FTP extensions to support IPv4/IPv6
> translation scenario.
>
> The Working Group must not introduce a new version of FTP, e.g.
> an incompatible FTP 2.0.
>
> Goals and Milestones
> Oct 2010    Submit 'File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual
> Hosts' as working group item (draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftp-hosts will be
> used as a starting point)
> Oct 2010    Submit 'File Transfer Protocol HASH Command for
> Cryptographic Hashes' as working group item (draft-bryan-ftp-hash will
> be used as a starting point)
> TBD 2010    Working group Last Call of HOST document
> TBD 2010    Submit 'File Transfer Protocol HOST Command for Virtual
> Hosts' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard
> TBD 2011    Working group Last Call of HASH document
> TBD 2011    Submit 'File Transfer Protocol HASH Command for
> Cryptographic Hashes' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed
> Standard
> TBD 2011    Close or recharter
>
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, William F. Maton <wmaton@ottix.net> wrote:
>>
>> Punt it into ftpext2 please, otherwise there's not much point to having
>> one.
>>
>> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Robert McMurray wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to submit a new draft (see attached) that is unrelated to my
>>> other draft - should we be using FTPEXT2 as the WG? Or should continue to
>>> submit as individual drafts to the Applications Area?
>
>
> --
> (( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ]
>   )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads
> _______________________________________________
> ftpext mailing list
> ftpext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext
>