[ftpext] FTP64 LANGuage [was RE: [BEHAVE] one week WGLC, draft-ietf-behave-ftp64-05]

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Mon, 03 January 2011 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A553A3A6BAA; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:36:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GxFup5SaOUZh; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:36:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990C53A6B15; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:36:43 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-3.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAL3CIU2rRN+J/2dsb2JhbACXPYx4c6JvmRKFSgSCen1u
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,268,1291593600"; d="scan'208";a="253975600"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Jan 2011 20:38:50 +0000
Received: from dwingWS (sjc-vpn6-1124.cisco.com [10.21.124.100]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p03KcoQ0001358; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 20:38:50 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: 'Iljitsch van Beijnum' <iljitsch@muada.com>
References: <0cac01cb58ea$32d19a60$9874cf20$@com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF65343005F2@TK5EX14MBXW601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <B166ACF7-FA96-4954-8411-A86BC7923A76@muada.com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653447D195@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653447ECAF@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <8B73074C-5B7E-425F-B8B2-C28757FB7CD6@muada.com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653447F40D@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653447F599@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <049901cba2cc$238f67e0$6aae37a0$@com> <101F87C4-F714-48C2-852A-67332B712DD1@muada.com> <04a401cba2ce$fdba5180$f92ef480$@com> <B1535EAD-802E-4EF6-ACA5-7F66BCFED987@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <B1535EAD-802E-4EF6-ACA5-7F66BCFED987@muada.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:38:50 -0800
Message-ID: <015d01cbab86$3aa832a0$aff897e0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acui6l3NHck6gDWLR/+iYfvxNL8tqwImxCtA
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: draft-ietf-behave-ftp64@tools.ietf.org, ftpext@ietf.org, 'Behave WG' <behave@ietf.org>, 'Dave Thaler' <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Subject: [ftpext] FTP64 LANGuage [was RE: [BEHAVE] one week WGLC, draft-ietf-behave-ftp64-05]
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 20:36:44 -0000

> Maybe at this point in the discussion it would be good to hear from
> implementers. There are already tons of NAT44 FTP ALGs out there, I
> wonder how those solve this.

For whatever it's worth, I checked the FTP ALG for NAT44 in Cisco's
IOS, and it does nothing special with LANG (it doesn't block the
command nor parse the FEAT response).  We have other ALGs in other
products (e.g., Linksys, ASA), but I did not check those.  Our bug 
database (which spans all Cisco-branded products) has no customer 
complaints about FTP's LANG support.

-d