Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts

Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com> Mon, 18 October 2010 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8B93A6E71 for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.331
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.331 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.268, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i1lpyjSmjR3X for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com (mail-ew0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1306F3A6B02 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so1032947ewy.31 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pNB1jDgkDrNrzVp2bGESRaQHoUz5+NRu03VgHZsgz2E=; b=HpXpoEyMnnxHKiTe2qVc9PCNRDlLmzK7qtLTC8KZ+m0/TiFujBi4Od041LHPznJ/XH AnIzdx4kvQcyBOd7gYugVxsAQbHbaYNzZPsgW/RPDM/6UtuWETo+gh4ss5RCNiPrpfcq ev5NoLja9YVQ5GRO863fyLMVxRynBnLbTEOU0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IiKQ2i1Uu8t1QmcDGq1gRLJBL1HUHWhobeixigblMai3qa2ABkx5fZTuVijkTV1h/n V1ZEdb+fDXA48ZCdTFFd3k4OohBBqrlrxWMPa6RfrQh1BgvFg+CYHtOXGbfWqjWlomRl tlJu90bdSHQxWUmi8ziWoNPuzmJEqPXsEYv4Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.106.20 with SMTP id v20mr3868974ebo.40.1287433211444; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.4.148 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A5FC996C3C37DC4DA5076F1046B5674C431FF311@TK5EX14MBXC127.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <A5FC996C3C37DC4DA5076F1046B5674C431FD205@TK5EX14MBXC127.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010171017300.14040@iskra.ottix.net> <AANLkTimFkMmNnpAWWwx9xmJzGoJCHAwqvMrOMoZ-bHZ+@mail.gmail.com> <A5FC996C3C37DC4DA5076F1046B5674C431FF311@TK5EX14MBXC127.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:20:11 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTimv_RW3nxRq8=F47rOKTe4MscMkvFA0J67Fa_Dh@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
To: Robert McMurray <robmcm@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "ftpext@ietf.org" <ftpext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:18:52 -0000

I would say submit it now (you only have a few hours left) under Apps,
or you won't have it for discussion at the IETF meeting or be able to
submit it until November 8.

I'll add it to the draft charter once I see it's submitted.

btw, (this is to everyone) any comments on how to improve the draft charter?

"The pre-meeting cutoff date for new documents (i.e., version -00
Internet-Drafts) is 2010-10-18 at 5 PM (PT). You will not be able to
submit a new document after this time until 2010-11-08, at midnight"

also, I think there is some overlap between AGNT from your draft &
CSID from http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-peterson-streamlined-ftp-command-extensions

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Robert McMurray <robmcm@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Anthony.
>
> The lack of an FTPEXT WG is the problem that I was referring to - I'd like to add the proposed draft that I sent out last week to the proposed FTPEXT WG's charter, but since it isn't a formal WG yet then I wasn't sure how best to proceed. (e.g. Should I submit the draft to the applications area for now just to start the peer review process while awaiting the next phase of the FTPEXT WG process? )
>
> Thanks again.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Bryan [mailto:anthonybryan@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 11:20 PM
> To: William F. Maton
> Cc: Robert McMurray; ftpext@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts
>
> I think the problem is that there isn't a FTPEXT WG yet & it doesn't seem definite that there will be one.
>
> I've been posting a draft charter (included here) but...not sure what the next step is.
>
> I added draft-liu-ftp64-extension, which I just saw turn up.
>
> somewhat on topic, does anyone know how to change the WG in xml2rfc?
>
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, William F. Maton <wmaton@ottix.net> wrote:
>>
>> Punt it into ftpext2 please, otherwise there's not much point to having one.
>>
>> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Robert McMurray wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to submit a new draft (see attached) that is unrelated to my
>>> other draft - should we be using FTPEXT2 as the WG? Or should
>>> continue to submit as individual drafts to the Applications Area?
>
>



-- 
(( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ]
  )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads