IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ftpext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64-01.txt

liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com> Tue, 25 October 2011 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <maxpassion@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52201F0C50 for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PU8pEnLW5TTG for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73961F0C41 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iabn5 with SMTP id n5so8258iab.31 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3jv928QpVszdgwa84UJ8F/gZcpVEhuZ8y1dlFmwa7+I=; b=CLqOsVSlMRbccT821tf/aX9jTKL27/x/7/yEIcGEqJPtiY4ZGL7zq4gtiezjFUmW9N l9FUw9gVY7fgzliZW0s7SzThZ2wCZ7RecDj8N1UviFhDD/w1+dSaikRM+aG7/zVu+5Kc pLK24nhdJtHWWHlNakhuFFZC+pMul0n+XfDiw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.43.65.79 with SMTP id xl15mr19042627icb.6.1319508698335; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.228.68 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <307F6EAD43104B7DB589F155@PST.JCK.COM>
References: <20110711021824.28949.30520.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <307F6EAD43104B7DB589F155@PST.JCK.COM>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:11:38 +0800
Message-ID: <CAKcc6AcLwO+xZcC3qQMF1r20gT0y2eUARx=DMGyuf2B7+AiruA@mail.gmail.com>
From: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: ftpext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ftpext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:11:41 -0000

2011/7/11, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>:
>
>>    The File transfer protocol, which is defined by the RFC
>> 959, has a long history, but still being widely used.  The
>> original version of FTP specification defines IPv4 version
>> of FTP.
>
> This is obviously not a big deal --I'll have more real comments
> on the draft later-- but the above statement from the abstract
> is unquestionably false.
>
> The original version of the FTP specification was published in
> April 1971 in RFC 114, long before IPv4 was even imagined.  It
> defined the NCP version of FTP for the ARPANET.
>
>   -- john
>     (Aka cranky old guy who was somewhat involved in the
> original design and who has been using FTP since 1971)
Thanks for the comments, I will update the draft accordingly.

Regards,
Dapeng Liu
> _______________________________________________
> ftpext mailing list
> ftpext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext
>


-- 

------
Best Regards,
Dapeng Liu

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email