IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts

Robert McMurray <robmcm@microsoft.com> Mon, 18 October 2010 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <robmcm@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E3D3A6BA1 for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o41R8KU3CLo7 for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F3F3A6B97 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.159) by TK5-EXGWY-E801.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:06:55 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC127.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.6.93]) by TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.159]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:06:46 -0700
From: Robert McMurray <robmcm@microsoft.com>
To: 'Anthony Bryan' <anthonybryan@gmail.com>, "'William F. Maton'" <wmaton@ottix.net>
Thread-Topic: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts
Thread-Index: Acts12dO7mju2PbkRH6PeH4GsapAbgBaWEiAACGVrIAACbSPAA==
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:06:45 +0000
Message-ID: <A5FC996C3C37DC4DA5076F1046B5674C431FF311@TK5EX14MBXC127.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <A5FC996C3C37DC4DA5076F1046B5674C431FD205@TK5EX14MBXC127.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010171017300.14040@iskra.ottix.net> <AANLkTimFkMmNnpAWWwx9xmJzGoJCHAwqvMrOMoZ-bHZ+@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimFkMmNnpAWWwx9xmJzGoJCHAwqvMrOMoZ-bHZ+@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.72]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "'ftpext@ietf.org'" <ftpext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:05:34 -0000

Thanks, Anthony.

The lack of an FTPEXT WG is the problem that I was referring to - I'd like to add the proposed draft that I sent out last week to the proposed FTPEXT WG's charter, but since it isn't a formal WG yet then I wasn't sure how best to proceed. (e.g. Should I submit the draft to the applications area for now just to start the peer review process while awaiting the next phase of the FTPEXT WG process? )

Thanks again.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Bryan [mailto:anthonybryan@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 11:20 PM
To: William F. Maton
Cc: Robert McMurray; ftpext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ftpext] Submitting new drafts

I think the problem is that there isn't a FTPEXT WG yet & it doesn't seem definite that there will be one.

I've been posting a draft charter (included here) but...not sure what the next step is.

I added draft-liu-ftp64-extension, which I just saw turn up.

somewhat on topic, does anyone know how to change the WG in xml2rfc?

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, William F. Maton <wmaton@ottix.net> wrote:
>
> Punt it into ftpext2 please, otherwise there's not much point to having one.
>
> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Robert McMurray wrote:
>
>> I'd like to submit a new draft (see attached) that is unrelated to my 
>> other draft - should we be using FTPEXT2 as the WG? Or should 
>> continue to submit as individual drafts to the Applications Area?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email