IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ftpext] Soliciting comments/reviews on draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Sun, 22 May 2011 05:06 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5549BE072F; Sat, 21 May 2011 22:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.076, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IaAOwkfowD-h; Sat, 21 May 2011 22:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54F5E0618; Sat, 21 May 2011 22:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so7662985bwz.27 for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 21 May 2011 22:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type; bh=HNzONX2Zy+8xhso6DTBRVKCw5An2i0Fxv+CjMW3C/W4=; b=FFLvJKW1dissHx/+XyW9SgeDQufdZOjjPfee6z0INGq75jN6mzxoQmlVdlallhiFcn /ob38ImvBhzWxjBX4zklclqvj36TMpydFAmothh1Gaw08ijYf252oZdf93Qbnso+bUSH 84mdqBnDqe7sm/1bQs9vrl4URqxWzNVFDUcXM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type; b=agwm2/iBed9QeiS4FZN2+OWR3jeIM4Dark4X9Sx2pylVVzNEDLWIyx4ZmF2BX9gnYE HcllnJnVhpbCdLGVZZKSk9Bw/DbkLYCH2Afy783AEJ/S2pN2gEbRV3msjFGIz03v1o3C D26Lwg++BoiFPIPzRCfTbwtfpnakhiMS49EZk=
Received: by 10.205.32.65 with SMTP id sj1mr996514bkb.36.1306040811409; Sat, 21 May 2011 22:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q25sm3080074bkk.10.2011.05.21.22.06.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 21 May 2011 22:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DD89A18.3090105@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 08:07:36 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, ftpext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050606090507070500050804"
Subject: [ftpext] Soliciting comments/reviews on draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 05:06:56 -0000

Hello all,

I'm writing to ask people to comment my draft 
draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme, that may be found here:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yevstifeyev-ftp-uri-scheme-00

This document removes uncertainty with the 'ftp' URI scheme, currently 
specified by obsolete RFC 1738 (see my message: 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review/current/msg01442.html).  
RFC 4395 says that 4 weeks review-and-comment period is fine for 
permanent registration, so please feel free to provide your comments on 
my document during these 4 weeks.

{I understand that ftpext list isn't the most appropriate list, but I 
think posting this message there will allow FTP experts read and express 
their thoughts on this document.}

Please, when responding, keep all "To:" and "Cc:" addresses in the message.

Thanks,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email