Re: [ftpext] FTP Host Draft

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 09 September 2010 07:51 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCBA3A67CC for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 00:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.835
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.835 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.236, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1OhK7fMfe0Fs for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 00:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E023A6778 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 00:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [92.40.210.160] (92.40.210.160.sub.mbb.three.co.uk [92.40.210.160]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TIiSHwBIEB4u@rufus.isode.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 08:52:02 +0100
Message-ID: <4C889215.8080509@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:51:49 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Robert McMurray <robmcm@microsoft.com>
References: <A5FC996C3C37DC4DA5076F1046B5674C3D3B9523@TK5EX14MBXC127.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1009080525460.15358@iskra.ottix.net> <AANLkTikRvtcBaOmOi56MVGOM6W7ky=Prx_My_d=RO+mu@mail.gmail.com> <A5FC996C3C37DC4DA5076F1046B5674C3D45EB87@TK5EX14MBXC127.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <A5FC996C3C37DC4DA5076F1046B5674C3D45EB87@TK5EX14MBXC127.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:53:01 -0700
Cc: "ftpext@ietf.org" <ftpext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ftpext] FTP Host Draft
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 07:51:43 -0000

Hi Robert,

Robert McMurray wrote:

>If we're unsure about the timing of the WG formation, then I'd think that it's probably best to pursue as an ID.
>
>Alexey, what are your thoughts? Do you have any objections to continuing this draft as an ID?
>
I think I need to know if there is a desire to form a WG first.
Then we can discuss timing of finishing your draft in relationship to 
estimated timing of creating the WG.
If there is no energy to form a WG any time soon, I will progress your 
draft independently.

I don't want to impose lots of process on you (and cause a delay), but I 
would prefer this be a WG document.

>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Anthony Bryan [mailto:anthonybryan@gmail.com] 
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 5:19 PM
>>To: William F. Maton
>>Cc: Robert McMurray; ftpext@ietf.org
>>Subject: Re: [ftpext] FTP Host Draft
>>
>>it's already gone through IETF LC, not WGLC.
>>
>>Robert, as the author of the most mature FTP ID, would you want to
>>wait for WG formation? you probably have the least to gain. your draft
>>is 3 years old, and HOST was in the ID that became RFC 3659 in 1998,
>>so HOST has had some time to stabilize.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Robert McMurray wrote:
>>>
>>>The FTP HOST command draft completed last call in May and Alexey Melnikov
>>>signed off in June, but we put it on hold for the IETF meeting in
>>>Maastricht.
>>>
>>>http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftp-hosts/
>>>
>>>Is there any reason why it cannot continue to move forward at this time?
>>>Should it continue as an individual submission?
>>>
>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>>Robert McMurray
>>>US-IIS Product Unit
>>>Email: robmcm@microsoft.com
>>>
>
>  
>