IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ftpext] RFC Errata for consideration

"William F. Maton" <wmaton@ottix.net> Thu, 26 August 2010 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <wmaton@ottix.net>
X-Original-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297093A6B06 for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:58:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MjqRcgvOLQD5 for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iskra.ottix.net (iskra.ottix.net [IPv6:2001:410:90ff::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C533A6B04 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iskra.ottix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iskra.ottix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7QKx4YO025533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:59:04 -0400
X-DomainKeys: Sendmail DomainKeys Filter v1.0.2 iskra.ottix.net o7QKx4YO025533
Received: from localhost (wmaton@localhost) by iskra.ottix.net (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id o7QKx3tH025528; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:59:03 -0400
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:59:03 -0400
From: "William F. Maton" <wmaton@ottix.net>
To: Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinFLFPQKbN-GKVj6z7g7ktUVeFtMzxpr9jQrBga@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008261657150.23449@iskra.ottix.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1007301540330.15461@iskra.ottix.net> <AANLkTimqJxcTzH2BQM+NhGixM5Z+kpSVnUBauQSiqftJ@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008031843520.2300@iskra.ottix.net> <AANLkTi=+ZKwug2+czAAMWxFqFqo3hP3_4vng_yX0ydpV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinFLFPQKbN-GKVj6z7g7ktUVeFtMzxpr9jQrBga@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: ftpext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ftpext] RFC Errata for consideration
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:58:38 -0000

On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Anthony Bryan wrote:

>>> Good catch.
>
> here are the other 3 errata I've reported on FTP RFCs lately. these
> are all nitpicky editorial & not important, but I think these older
> documents are worth reviewing by anyone who has time.

Thanks.  Interestingly enough I have been swimming around some of the FTP 
code I have around here and found this little gem:

/* Note: a response of 425 is not mentioned as a possible response to the
  * PASV command in RFC959. However, it has been blessed as a legitimate
  * response by Jon Postel in a telephone conversation with Rick Adams on 25
  * Jan 89. */

Ah, the good ol' days. :-)

wfms

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status