IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ftpext] FWD: ftp/959 reboot

"William F. Maton" <wmaton@ottix.net> Fri, 20 August 2010 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <wmaton@ottix.net>
X-Original-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799183A699E for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.514
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.514 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.085, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QWptcy-mcgMx for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iskra.ottix.net (iskra.ottix.net [IPv6:2001:410:90ff::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829493A691B for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iskra.ottix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iskra.ottix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7KMrQ69026413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:53:26 -0400
X-DomainKeys: Sendmail DomainKeys Filter v1.0.2 iskra.ottix.net o7KMrQ69026413
Received: from localhost (wmaton@localhost) by iskra.ottix.net (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id o7KMrQIZ026410; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:53:26 -0400
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:53:26 -0400
From: "William F. Maton" <wmaton@ottix.net>
To: Paul Ford-Hutchinson <paulfordh@uk.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OFCA35852F.D4B1CD2F-ON80257781.00339E13-80257781.0035C98D@uk.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008201853110.6009@iskra.ottix.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008051641520.24282@iskra.ottix.net> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008052249300.11871@tvnag.unkk.fr> <AANLkTi=1ePodG=2G9Ta-=5Fut6x-bQxvq8eLXsVgaUjh@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008092256460.10815@tvnag.unkk.fr> <AANLkTikB0J_aL7CTwnC17wH2+FS=QgQB5SCL2Jp9iJBd@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008101303001.1146@iskra.ottix.net> <AANLkTim1VnSPnhmuMa9RC5Ubjnnn=Q+rK6R2riRAznfj@mail.gmail.com> <4C685C23.9000801@filezilla-project.org> <OFCA35852F.D4B1CD2F-ON80257781.00339E13-80257781.0035C98D@uk.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: "ftpext@ietf.org" <ftpext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ftpext] FWD: ftp/959 reboot
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:53:01 -0000

On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Paul Ford-Hutchinson wrote:

> Tim Kosse wrote on 15/08/2010 22:29:07:
>
>> While it would definitely break compatibility with old implementations,
>> it would greatly simplify the protocol. I wonder if it is even possible
>> or desired to change FTP in such a drastic way or if that is a clear
> no-go.
>
> My 2c - big, big no-go.

+1

wfms

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email