Re: [Fud] BoF approved

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 10 October 2017 05:39 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: fud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A424132C2A for <fud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 22:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cVPcdu28wwfC for <fud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 22:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5053E1332D5 for <fud@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 22:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9A5dcP9029696; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:39:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sev.localdomain (unknown [212.98.163.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3yB5XT5RKPzDKx5; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:39:37 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <AC684600-A22E-4745-8637-D744F3D200EC@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:39:36 +0200
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, fud@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 529306775.330655-0aca6227046ce427d2a06ccf9b2d4818
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <410217DA-2E71-4A01-89A9-122DBA441D2B@tzi.org>
References: <CAHbuEH6vUO-o3iu=64nF6qeZZg7+8pXmfJVLT2_+UZ1h_+YmjA@mail.gmail.com> <12088.1507585687@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAHbuEH7cr+hFdzLU4A2CqGaD14fHUvA_Jf6L00dUr7_4B3bUCw@mail.gmail.com> <25499.1507600462@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <AC684600-A22E-4745-8637-D744F3D200EC@gmail.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/fud/C8_ccLEBuYzi7lEc_8VutybSnUg>
Subject: Re: [Fud] BoF approved
X-BeenThere: fud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: FUD - Firmware Updating Description <fud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fud>, <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/fud/>
List-Post: <mailto:fud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fud>, <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 05:39:45 -0000

On Oct 10, 2017, at 05:00, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> FUD is a great humourous first name, but not a good long term one.
>> I like SUIT a lot.
>> 
>> I'd rather it was renamed before the BOF so as to remove that bikeshed from
>> the mic line.
> 
> Good point, it could be a colossal waste of time.  I'd like to hear a bit more from participants, I believe the chairs punted to me.

Please rename.

When we started the work on Improvements of DTLS for the IOT, we got strong feedback from implementers that they wouldn’t be able to get their organizations to do work on components that are labelled IDIOT.  So DICE it became.

The same logic applies here.

(And SUIT indeed is a good name — I actually do like the fact that it calls what used to be called “firmware”, “software” instead.)

Grüße, Carsten