IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Fud] Editorial Charter Update

Chris Rouland <chris@phosphorus.io> Sun, 01 October 2017 14:11 UTC

Return-Path: <chris@phosphorus.io>
X-Original-To: fud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0EE1344C9 for <fud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Oct 2017 07:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=phosphorus-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KFd0cmd9ZQlT for <fud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Oct 2017 07:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com (mail-qk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E95DC134973 for <fud@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Oct 2017 07:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id w63so3205611qkd.10 for <fud@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 07:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=phosphorus-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=VKSJWNjmdxpmlpYKiL/DbtehJSEAChW+TscawH5ATjY=; b=zjvPhTi3OQ3grIxAPd1ak0hO7GKbGiVLqVNdYsG7qBToDpuDpc19zXcT8Q97vpUt/9 vDbyIzTqtKLZhAKveZmwJtUv+ganWLK9J7qq1XHJ3WHhZnh1JTrui1R8kovGEuNjhv0X 1/LttOt+0xiN0zEyJ45OcV/2yrTBMRwlxTCIfIAUcuGdS+GBiu6L9eiQE3gQBYgSXnWc j2UAInHH7UoyaUtDrR98Qubkw1fj7c4A4xKyPJpvvTC93tVDTdbLtavy/4CAc4Yn+YfE a77NAP6t95KngnsSQJdPYo3mANvC6wj5vHpz7f3i59dygrhMzwSRePDDm8y/pFSg3K/C bEMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=VKSJWNjmdxpmlpYKiL/DbtehJSEAChW+TscawH5ATjY=; b=GLA5iQ8Y8pDgHs9hjV+AQweB2RrweLHTUytPvjtg1yXmNvNevV9pbAFJt+6REAgyRX 7yIjrKRwd6FB8eefvNmeiMLj6SSTCzJJnwKL6S8o0fwlKMKAE9XhBybFRXdeWCb2MQVN pfqLc5XmCs61sB0+OXczqnEWePYq8VMktHKuq27QCpNe60ho6X/Vhx98HvaIE51zVoC3 RYtd20waovqakL5yM5VkQDHkE6auKpWv+3ZF979BYGnTSqKbSQ/n22KzfZfBXF41j4t3 L96Gd3wTmo1RkCdNm7ms/LAG3ygj4ldaoOFzugnOk/mjG4iJlTD33WwDGMVdiWxVppAE AwsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWZ3ZNN/hdqCXxyWXVEojtIv7uMS8BhknLR4m9YqOrkuUfoJdY1 9zqql+DF+al86o99fk72ZbSD5NCZt5g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCzpcXx+AW0h5nNbjEwQxEcmqsW252NNNBjaR2eRcy7VJZIFi45lxa94TLN+MsgZlVn1BQ2wA==
X-Received: by 10.55.144.5 with SMTP id s5mr11549500qkd.63.1506867092752; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 07:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.10.1] ([12.152.225.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n89sm4265632qkl.62.2017.10.01.07.11.31 for <fud@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 01 Oct 2017 07:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Rouland <chris@phosphorus.io>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FD9C0A42-D6BB-431F-B989-C196AAC3BFC8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 10:11:29 -0400
References: <c14c92bf-cf99-efdb-6693-0e33519fbb0a@gmx.net> <CANK0pbaOHTb85xEZuAQ=3ju0P0HdU-8W4Gt8Ma_N3N90-YPSnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: fud@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CANK0pbaOHTb85xEZuAQ=3ju0P0HdU-8W4Gt8Ma_N3N90-YPSnw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <8E6DE4EA-ADC8-434D-9BFD-87AFE2387DCE@phosphorus.io>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/fud/Rl15o8MnUNVr1cbkKvvJ9mAAe3E>
Subject: Re: [Fud] Editorial Charter Update
X-BeenThere: fud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: FUD - Firmware Updating Description <fud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fud>, <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/fud/>
List-Post: <mailto:fud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fud>, <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 14:11:36 -0000

Hi,

I do think that locking into the firmware binary itself could exclude a significant part of the problem set around updating embedded IOT operating systems that would not technically be classified as FW.

I think SUIT is good and broad.


-Chris


> On Oct 1, 2017, at 3:20 AM, Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr> wrote:
> 
> Hi Hannes,
> 
> thanks for the update. Reads well in my opinion. 
> A couple of comments below:
> 
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net <mailto:hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>> wrote:
> 
> 
> Firmware Updating Description (FUD)
> [Alternative proposal: SUIT (Software Updates for Internet of Things).]
> 
> 
> To no surprise, I really like SUIT, but if the WG focuses only on firmware and excludes other types of software updates, we should probably keep that name for another working group ;)
> 
> On the other hand, FUD is still a problematic name. How about an alternative such as:
> 
> FiDeL : Firmware Description for Low-end IoT devices
> 
> 
> out of scope are
> software update solutions that aim to take the features of scripting
> languages, such as JavaScript variants like JerryScript, into account.
> 
> FYI JerryScript is fully compliant with ECMA5.1, hence not really a "variant".
> Here, I don't think we need to be that precise anyway to get the message across.
> How about rephrasing with something like:
> 
> "Software update solutions that target updating software other than the firmware binary (e.g. updating scripts) are out of scope".
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Emmanuel
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Fud mailing list
> Fud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fud

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email