Re: [Fud] Charter Text

Olaf Bergmann <bergmann@tzi.org> Mon, 07 August 2017 10:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bergmann@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: fud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9965132195 for <fud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 03:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IuVZzGGToes6 for <fud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 03:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD5E1293E1 for <fud@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 03:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v77AW1Cf018322; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:32:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from aung.tzi.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:638:708:301:224:d6ff:fe13:2040]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3xQv3N6S4WzDMQW; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 12:32:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Olaf Bergmann <bergmann@tzi.org>
To: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
Cc: fud@ietf.org, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
References: <8f8528da-d1eb-08c7-b3fe-b1f4febed595@gmx.net> <CANK0pbbbgEONiCeuQGOuRO9Gq62RpAVhh53xLxd5JOMQtJg-_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 12:32:00 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CANK0pbbbgEONiCeuQGOuRO9Gq62RpAVhh53xLxd5JOMQtJg-_g@mail.gmail.com> (Emmanuel Baccelli's message of "Sat, 22 Jul 2017 09:57:33 +0200")
Message-ID: <87d187oehr.fsf@aung.informatik.uni-bremen.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/fud/e0Z04T4uOCbieVaz_qLy_IlcNxA>
Subject: Re: [Fud] Charter Text
X-BeenThere: fud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: FUD - Firmware Updating Description <fud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fud>, <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/fud/>
List-Post: <mailto:fud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fud>, <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 10:32:11 -0000

Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr> writes:

> thanks a lot for the strawman! Reads well in my opinion. 

+1

> At high level, I have the following comments & suggestions:
>
> - we have the case of software updates, not only firmware updates, so
> I'd rather we talk about the more general case of software updates. Is
> there a strong reason against this?

This is more a question of whether a module is regarded as part of the
firmware (cf. "firmware package" in the text). Some application-specific
JavaScript code may or may not fall under this category. (You could,
e.g., discuss if Ethereum contracts are "software" in this sense. But I
am not sure that this would be addressed in this WG?)

Grüße
Olaf