IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Fud] Revised Charter Text

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 26 September 2017 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: fud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069A51342DB for <fud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7VfMALXqBVhD for <fud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D30C21330AE for <fud@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.91.203] ([80.92.122.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lj25i-1dLuKn0jmw-00dJoP; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:45:19 +0200
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: fud@ietf.org
References: <598d9373-4a4a-01c3-33e8-34ed1beceaa2@gmx.net> <B7D00C27-E186-4455-AEE4-02066F5D430F@tzi.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <88205e11-2b12-d88a-5613-4a52e865afc5@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:45:17 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B7D00C27-E186-4455-AEE4-02066F5D430F@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:TVvKMx/nhEICtrse3lLaRlMz7P/KpdtxTuSKSW18doPVOaNoq5y IeN6PJxK1XhpPfXPfPZUjgTJaNFfIyl4yhqbh8XaD9VffSx/HGGrZoWX1Kskr8QnMCB1I/P uoCCl9EB0iM1ycFzxqlknDmfWyksJi5yaC4HK7xQoHO9G0uvwgPjbVJ0RaOVOFWMUUu5l4p foOIf8+mIfD3z8lDQrqQQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:DWqh5Af7nyo=:2S1APZji1VhWKyhM3XvW6C PUTFMbEqz6P0GfX8+3kI155DaHidb9pg8onH2jBGVQuLW/8xiLmO+viIqgjjaBBOPKeZWI+e0 zPqdMuyJYxU9DWnxVKfZfO9pftq+C7g6cC4gps+UjpZWa6hMKG/rLI6JizeQHtC00KjyYSFTw YIhhCasG3igw69Xm1B1FZzw90XQun0NZIxJQrpSy4K1VlbTauAMK/qG4LXnoGiVT++xqdprGI jBkFXnXgX0smLNlaaWZ23v+JMpTRXISc3qDGLmPyLTKiYS3fY5YlrvkIEoS8KOhr70WjmINte AaLsaEQ7r20deYNu5tCcpN9KOqfl5Tuz6AG9um02WMYzXlIHvam95OkER5fUPvlLVVCyE8RzP I06HYe3V3YBDDKESu/iquiQM5tLzA/srSlFANgsSIXlqn5R+YQQuBCum2TcotFW4NRParnVjl 2fH4yo3WHVaCjBpgpRdIHBKPpGQk+O2F8QJQFqxo4ynMM7tkCM2kHpsI0y8gI4AmGTeEkDdSB P+6OD3v8UDUdbxrlrIf4ezh+Rjl2zkoias3BWdq0S/eohk49GrV6Z19yY2X4Q2b9bjzenT8Cy MtYLprwkB9zU5THDchilwYa9RtIYK1HpqJDozyxj3rP9fsFGMNMHUFnLoDmaqQ8moVVr2gGUp x+13fNsW5+cpk2cdFEBDIgfzuEqBw2RDJfXa1j9qW6Umf4zIxHN+GTmwe9UgTZA4+hsJxShmP wLiPsnOejmAM//20cb5HWVwm5yahJIGsXdToSG6fGxF+Hc/eSxnSNk/TMaYiTX7+NfGSK6y0r YF380oQMUyoaJSeJKSqUAYWMbDrTWmzh7mXOS3nHmnxlLXitmg=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/fud/plWJcthXUBXXOaLZUCxaesHlS5o>
Subject: Re: [Fud] Revised Charter Text
X-BeenThere: fud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: FUD - Firmware Updating Description <fud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fud>, <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/fud/>
List-Post: <mailto:fud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fud>, <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:45:30 -0000

FWIW: SUIT (Software Updates for Internet of Things) is totally fine for
me. Finding the right name for a group or a protocol is always tricky.

On 09/26/2017 01:23 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> Firmware Updating Description (FUD)
>> [Alternative proposal: SUIT (Software Updates for Internet of Things).]
> SUIT is so much better than FUD.
> 
> (When we created the DICE working group, which was about “Improvements to DTLS for the Internet of Things”, we got some strong feedback that people weren’t going to install “IDIOT” modifications into their systems.
> I think the same applies for “FUD”.  And the suits will quickly agree with installing SUIT :-))
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email