Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Mon, 04 July 2011 05:13 UTC
Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302EE21F861C for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 22:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQoN6CXei2ir for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 22:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9B221F855F for <fun@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 22:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hpaq14.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq14.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.14]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p645DN0k020339 for <fun@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 22:13:24 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1309756404; bh=tVi6bkWcFpsfPLYdSlDxfZrEbtg=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ozFKE4EJJcOBGKA0Wz/K42A1ciG7smn0EK3zxkbdNnGfYR1r3lSb66eny2MNxQNET rCAHn94F5zNeKYB+jcizg==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=dkim-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-system-of-record; b=owz+t8lUSwWK/AS8dtY4resz3ZB7EXMYYR9JbxIe8h8r3r2Zvv9sTRwR7ogT1n7dF brAK9mVSMGTTUe+rjHVxw==
Received: from pzk27 (pzk27.prod.google.com [10.243.19.155]) by hpaq14.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p645DLbO009955 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <fun@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 22:13:22 -0700
Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so3118000pzk.27 for <fun@ietf.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 22:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PKH3St7XblsmakY49siZSGU5CH0WhmJt2iJ5Rnae4EI=; b=aMBLk/7ZYbriRf/kvLnBFF+vh99SOTCnnS3vdBSlXAA6Eu6CZVjJMjcD7atkqZAGt4 +E0pDAtyDAUrHj3Xywgg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.242.6 with SMTP id p6mr2683963wfh.96.1309756400933; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 22:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.179.17 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 22:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A244E343-80FE-424B-9F18-EA0A437721E9@apple.com>
References: <20110701204301.069D218C14E@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <A244E343-80FE-424B-9F18-EA0A437721E9@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 14:13:20 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAedzxqf+YeVHJeAfOWs44RvxAq5H4TA2qunUNWSaMfM9e-51w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: fun@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 05:13:26 -0000
> I suspect it wouldn't take much to adapt 6RD to these ends. Remember, 6RD tunnels do *not* need to be terminated by the provider network. They can be terminated by a third-party with minimal human interface burden. Perhaps I should find the time to write a draft on the topic. +1 This plus the idea of being able to map a public v6 address to an internal IPv4 address (the home gateway does the address family translation) and folks could have all manner of broader access that just what portmapping allows. If the mechanism could resync and adjust accordingly when the public IPv4 address changes (probably involving dyndns.org-like updates), then why not have multiple named webservers running at home (all on v6, port 80)? Things get more complicated if there's a CGN in the picture, but that could be addressed by separate efforts.
- Re: [fun] HOMENET working group proposal Jari Arkko
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Jari Arkko
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Fernando Gont
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Mark Townsley
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Jari Arkko
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Fernando Gont
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Fernando Gont
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Stephen [kiwin] PALM
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Keith Moore
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Stephen [kiwin] PALM
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Weil, Jason
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Stephen [kiwin] PALM
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Mark Townsley
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Keith Moore
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Fernando Gont
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Keith Moore
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Ralph Droms (rdroms)
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Stephen [kiwin] PALM
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Ralph Droms (rdroms)
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Mark Townsley
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Keith Moore
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… james woodyatt
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Edward Arthurs
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Mark Andrews
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… james woodyatt
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Mark Townsley
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Mark Townsley
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Martin Focazio
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Keith Moore
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… james woodyatt
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Keith Moore
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Kenneth Voort
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Keith Moore
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Keith Moore
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Doug Barton
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Noel Chiappa
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… james woodyatt
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Doug Barton
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Keith Moore
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Kenneth Voort
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Erik Kline
- Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group propos… Keith Moore