Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 01 July 2011 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7997F11E817C for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 14:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lIEQXBTRAhlW for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 14:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D1B11E80E7 for <fun@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 14:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AksIAPc/Dk6rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABSmQ6Oc3eIeaM3nVmGMgSSMoR2iz0
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,460,1304294400"; d="scan'208";a="473733045"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2011 21:49:55 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (sjc-raszuk-87113.cisco.com [10.20.147.254]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p61Lnswd019483 for <fun@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 21:49:55 GMT
Message-ID: <4E0E4105.6080208@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 23:49:57 +0200
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: fun@ietf.org
References: <4E0AE696.4020603@piuha.net> <4E0BDCF3.1090003@gont.com.ar> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106300707370.19581@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4E0C1CF8.7090601@gont.com.ar> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106300923280.19581@uplift.swm.pp.se> <558D0669-8B2A-4514-B3FB-C690C40A4EF8@townsley.net> <4E0E282B.1060400@voort.ca> <4E0E2A75.6040207@dougbarton.us>
In-Reply-To: <4E0E2A75.6040207@dougbarton.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 21:49:56 -0000

Doug,

> This is an area that we very clearly do not need to get involved in
> because it will solve itself due to market forces.

Maybe it will, but why not make it easier for early adopters ? 
Especially for those who would like to start offering some v6 content 
over their v4 ISPs today.

It seems that this is equally useful as AMT (Automatic IP Multicast 
Without Explicit Tunnels) as described in the below IETF WG doc:
draft-ietf-mboned-auto-multicast-10

R.