Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 01 July 2011 22:15 UTC
Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACE811E809B for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 15:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35OUKTslTmKY for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 15:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B830D11E8085 for <fun@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 15:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EANVGDk6rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABSqAF3iHmjZJ1bhjIEkjKEdos9
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,460,1304294400"; d="scan'208";a="351718602"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2011 22:14:50 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (sjc-raszuk-87113.cisco.com [10.20.147.254]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p61MEmqm009556; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 22:14:49 GMT
Message-ID: <4E0E46DC.90604@raszuk.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 00:14:52 +0200
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
References: <CA31F3ED.4AB6%jason.weil@twcable.com> <4E0DB36D.60303@raszuk.net> <7EC07A1A-CCD2-4A4A-A92D-8475430F558E@townsley.net> <4E0E409C.3050106@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E0E409C.3050106@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: fun@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 22:15:10 -0000
Hi Jari, > As Mark noted, some aspects of diagnostics and troubleshooting are > inherent in the notion of automatic configuration. Prefix delegation, > routing, etc. has to figure out if there is connectivity and what to do > if there isn't. But its mostly automatic, not built for human network > managers to play with. Well honestly while I agree that automation is great for vast majority of home networks, unfortunately for someone like me it is just scary - maybe too scary. If I buy or rent a car I always pick manual ... (maybe wrong comparison maybe not ... but it is just a matter of awareness of one's skills of control). > I think multihoming solutions should be out of scope. Maybe I was not sufficiently precise. I am not asking to roll-out new models of PIC or active/active load balancing for home networks. I am just trying to see a room for a spec which would define what should be the CPE behaviour when someone connects two DSL/Cable/Mixed lines to it. I hope we would not prohibit it ... and if not the behaviour needs to be either defined here or referenced as Mark mentioned earlier to other documents which solve this already. Many thx, R.
- [fun] status of the homenet effort Jari Arkko
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Mark Townsley
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Weil, Jason
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Erik Kline
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Mark Townsley
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Jari Arkko
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Mark Townsley
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Soohong Daniel Park
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Jari Arkko
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Daniel Park
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Mark Townsley
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Robert Raszuk
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Mark Townsley
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Weil, Jason
- Re: [fun] [homegate] status of the homenet effort Ralph Droms
- Re: [fun] [homegate] status of the homenet effort JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [fun] [homegate] status of the homenet effort Weil, Jason
- Re: [fun] [homegate] status of the homenet effort Mark Townsley
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Jari Arkko
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Robert Raszuk
- [fun] Routing ? Cullen Jennings
- Re: [fun] Routing ? Jari Arkko
- Re: [fun] Routing ? Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [fun] Routing ? JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [fun] Routing ? Ralph Droms (rdroms)
- Re: [fun] Routing ? Cullen Jennings
- Re: [fun] Routing ? Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [fun] Routing ? Fred Baker
- Re: [fun] Routing ? Cullen Jennings
- Re: [fun] status of the homenet effort Joel Jaeggli