Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 01 July 2011 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641439E800A for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 16:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OU+z02LIv2XM for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 16:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE51A1F0C63 for <fun@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 16:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AksIAH1XDk6rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABSmQ6Oc3eIeaNfnWSGMgSSMoR2iz0
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,461,1304294400"; d="scan'208";a="390354968"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Jul 2011 23:26:45 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (sjc-raszuk-87113.cisco.com [10.20.147.254]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p61NQi5G030275 for <fun@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 23:26:45 GMT
Message-ID: <4E0E57B8.8050007@raszuk.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 01:26:48 +0200
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: fun@ietf.org
References: <20110701204301.069D218C14E@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <A244E343-80FE-424B-9F18-EA0A437721E9@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <A244E343-80FE-424B-9F18-EA0A437721E9@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [fun] [homegate] HOMENET working group proposal
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 23:27:53 -0000

Hi James,

> I suspect it wouldn't take much to adapt 6RD to these ends.
> Remember, 6RD tunnels do*not*  need to be terminated by the provider
> network.  They can be terminated by a third-party with minimal human
> interface burden.  Perhaps I should find the time to write a draft on
> the topic.

Finding a time to write a draft is a great idea. However I think even 
better idea would be to find and wiki the list of actual providers 
anyone could terminate his 6RD to.

R.