[gaia] South African operators call for regulation of OTT services

David Johnson <david.lloyd.johnson@gmail.com> Thu, 14 January 2016 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <david.lloyd.johnson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528AD1B2B04 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:09:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.7
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kWxFGdPwyyPk for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA2431B2A5C for <gaia@irtf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:09:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id m198so124516327lfm.0 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:09:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=O3ImhqnpgrW8XvJDAc61b2E+2kbAa3LVGf4OqduiT1I=; b=tppIAtg0g/HtedsORdDcoMh2mHxoFJJOUtsGBp/HyZpOeM+nlDa1MVQ1hDpo9gRUX0 qzjRv0GHb8XQKqre/++daeLQNsq2mu+qctAV6QYxXXyQrwOzsikYY+L2de1ZEfLZsfAJ B/QTaWhT4OivGdExPzVvuq7oo0v58Cx7ilR896Gl69XmEqXWELK9subHifDnkssxim3n Wgj7EYMl+1gBFJxply2FPVQFj85WqkLN1y9nf3cFRyfAAQnhhG8go1pARrbPhlCZ+UMT zM5d0zMdQE3FDsjNCw3JMfYOJGszmsGmgrPSBTcCfskxk/UFCpCCfbEnWJKQmb/nZ5mn nZ5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=O3ImhqnpgrW8XvJDAc61b2E+2kbAa3LVGf4OqduiT1I=; b=KHtv1sn4snkHBjg91eSOOIhOPcLBnH2of2CsF0hA9Iuu1HA2lRgwPewxMbnV1LDl+s s/R+KmYb9e1SuXoEFDBexZIax9qC2YJBaVRKM2siQvatuvw8crV6Rl9a8E5kI8VroiNj PcNOS2CmCuCAHduiYkYc9mU9MMjMBgcoSv/RlvAi1VtHG1OG8DO/ILosbab7b91YPUZ/ +0sfb/RjBmkyIxPV3rjAI/Pvvq7nF5Gffi+Pg2FIww3HALZMDyk+HAwV1CnnQISq0SRv liowogZn9vLW4G/ZXXl3Ntzn/uIg2RkD0aGE53Ps3KidiztVUX7kdkwrRUfElC8cupD2 Dzgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkBZ3BrN4KrF6lA8isUPaXqKRm57+UsjQDOwcPnkz01t95wuC2Dj8mEG3BF/l1fUFgXb9CpNquylHw1/DfdIxc4XcrFEQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id j77mr1947494lfi.84.1452809366700; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:09:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:09:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:09:26 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFDDukAX5+4GsDWpvyfftzzETPXzANnvCTTryWfRcntygxVJAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Johnson <david.lloyd.johnson@gmail.com>
To: gaia <gaia@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/1h1ACqCHBNSvumd2mtOFmFI6pnQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:05:12 -0800
Subject: [gaia] South African operators call for regulation of OTT services
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 22:09:30 -0000

So it looks like South Africa is about to have its India moment:


Interestingly enough this move is supported by the two dominant
operators in SA - MTN and Vodacom but one of the smaller players -
CellC has gone in the opposite direction and offers Unlimited WhatsApp
for the month for $0.4 per month. and  free Facebook and Facebook

Apart from the clear breach of net neutrality if such regulation is
enacted - the claim that OTT services are getting an unfair advantage
by allowing their services to make revenue through advertising /
low-cost calls etc. over their networks and should therefore pay extra
to run their services is ridiculous. Its precisely the popular
services like WhatsApp/Facebook - especially as users share
images/videos -  that bring in data revenue for the networks. And
operators just have to realise that SMS/voice is a dying revenue.
Charging  popular OTT services for running on their networks is like
asking Amazon to pay additional special road tax or extra toll fees
for making money by delivering goods on public roads or toll roads.

I guess services like torguard - which hide the services in normal
https traffic - can bypass the traffic classification if the evil
operators get their way.