Re: [gaia] FW: Heterogeneity in network capacity: growing?

Mirjam Kuehne <mir@ripe.net> Tue, 01 March 2016 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mir@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817441B2CBE for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 05:48:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lr-tRdH2BByf for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 05:48:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from molamola.ripe.net (molamola.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1371]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16BAE1B2CB6 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 05:48:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nene.ripe.net ([193.0.23.10]) by molamola.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <mir@ripe.net>) id 1aakei-0001gl-KP for gaia@irtf.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 14:48:06 +0100
Received: from sslvpn.ipv6.ripe.net ([2001:67c:2e8:9::c100:14e6] helo=guest179.guestnet.ripe.net) by nene.ripe.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mir@ripe.net>) id 1aakei-0001AN-F8 for gaia@irtf.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 14:48:04 +0100
To: gaia@irtf.org
References: <32116_1456700693_56D37D15_32116_453_1_CF23F499-41D1-4DA6-A306-8924DC4F4DB4@ifi.uio.no> <41954A84-EFF0-4107-9859-E60AAC65285C@aalto.fi> <56F64461-28A0-4E5E-9923-D177B663EFB7@ifi.uio.no> <e3a59b97b74543a7960911bc155e8830@rew09926dag05b.domain1.systemhost.net> <E41521ED-AA4F-4AE5-BA02-6BD7B7DFC621@ifi.uio.no> <EE9E048C-DD05-4DB3-929F-DF337355DC90@isoc.org>
From: Mirjam Kuehne <mir@ripe.net>
Message-ID: <56D59D94.2090109@ripe.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:48:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EE9E048C-DD05-4DB3-929F-DF337355DC90@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-ACL-Warn: Delaying message
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -2.9 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
X-RIPE-Signature: 7e0932718cf60c1d07d29cd25dae9274061fd3ea22d37b6667f8ee7ac2de0831
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/20EP96NDxpJ3i1fauG67bbgJqm0>
Subject: Re: [gaia] FW: Heterogeneity in network capacity: growing?
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 13:48:18 -0000

Hi,

Thanks to Jane Coffin for pointing me to this discussion.

You might also want to have a look at the RIPE Atlas system, a worldwide
active measurements network: https://atlas.ripe.net/

While we don't actually measure bandwidth, the thousands of RIPE Atlas
measurement probes regularly send pings and traceroutes (and also SSL,
DNS queries) to certain pre-defined destinations on the Internet.
Especially the traceroute results could be interesting for the questions
below.

The measurement results are public and are used by many researchers and
operators for various use cases. Have a look at this blog for some
inspiration: https://labs.ripe.net/atlas

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me directly.

Kind regards,
Mirjam Kuehne
RIPE NCC

> 
> On 2/29/16, 2:59 PM, "gaia on behalf of Michael Welzl" <gaia-bounces@irtf.org on behalf of michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> 
>> Great, thanks!
>>
>> Good thinking about Akamai’s report - of course! I should have looked at that first
>>
>>
>>> On 29. feb. 2016, at 19.22, achilles.petras@bt.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Michael
>>>
>>> A good starting point is Ofcom's infrastructure annual report; here is the 2015 one:
>>> http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/infrastructure/2015/downloads/connected_nations2015.pdf
>>>
>>> You will find several distribution graphs like the one in Figure 4 that compares the monthly usage to the access speed range for 2014 and 2015.
>>>
>>> You could also find the reports from previous years to see how things have changed over time:
>>> http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/market-data/infrastructure/?a=0
>>>
>>> For a more global point of view, you could check Akamai's State of the Internet Report:
>>> https://www.stateoftheinternet.com/resources-connectivity-2015-q3-state-of-the-internet-report.html
>>>
>>> or play with their visualisations:
>>> https://www.stateoftheinternet.com/trends-visualizations-connectivity-global-heat-map-internet-speeds-broadband-adoption.html
>>>
>>> Hope this helps
>>> Achilles
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: gaia [mailto:gaia-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Michael Welzl
>>> Sent: 29 February 2016 08:16
>>> To: Manner Jukka <jukka.manner@aalto.fi>
>>> Cc: gaia@irtf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [gaia] Heterogeneity in network capacity: growing?
>>>
>>> First,
>>>
>>> Apologies for asking first formulating a question in two ways with contradictory outcomes (yes/no) and then saying "I guess the answer is no" - that was confusing!  :)   I was tired when I wrote it...
>>> so I meant the second question, i.e. my guess was also that heterogeneity *is* growing.
>>>
>>> How would you calculate if there was data: I guess what I'm interested in is bandwidth statistics: how often do we see a bottleneck of X bit/s? The Internet-wide distribution of X is what I'm looking for...
>>>
>>> Depending on area/market: I'd also be happy to have X for India, X for Europe, X for ... whatever. It's a start!
>>> Ideally citable - some publicly available study I could refer to.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 29 Feb 2016, at 08:33, Manner Jukka <jukka.manner@aalto.fi> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would say yes, they are globally, but it also depends on what area/market you are talking about. How would you calculate it if there was data? I have data, but not sure how to calculate this.
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Jukka
>>>>
>>>>> On 29 Feb 2016, at 01:04, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess this is probably the right group to ask: is the heterogeneity of link bandwidths growing?
>>>>> Another way of asking this is: across the whole Internet, do old links roughly get removed as quickly as capacities grow?
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess the answer is no - but are there any good citable references for this? Data?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> gaia mailing list
>>>>> gaia@irtf.org
>>>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gaia mailing list
>>> gaia@irtf.org
>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gaia mailing list
>> gaia@irtf.org
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia