Re: [gaia] Review required: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments

Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es> Mon, 21 March 2016 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB5A12D84D; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.236
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8HrzkMwsO9U1; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vortiz.unizar.es (vortiz.unizar.es [155.210.11.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7069912D77F; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from flumen.unizar.es ([155.210.11.58] helo=mail.unizar.es) by vortiz.unizar.es with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <jsaldana@unizar.es>) id 1ai1Df-0002L6-Hz; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:54:11 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:51:29 +0100
From: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Organization: University of Zaragoza
In-Reply-To: <DC7BF522-B153-46AB-BA0F-685DC57CA36D@netapp.com>
References: <003101d17914$247b6b30$6d724190$@unizar.es> <56E8294E.6040807@article19.org> <a1bda1d46bf7fa6c87ea9c678823b38a@unizar.es> <56EC0A21.8010009@article19.org> <00c301d18128$a40e71a0$ec2b54e0$@unizar.es> <20160320125110.GD32067@mate.lo-res.org> <56EE9EE1.9030700@cs.tcd.ie>,<20160320130532.GE32067@mate.lo-res.org> <DC7BF522-B153-46AB-BA0F-685DC57CA36D@netapp.com>
Message-ID: <bcb4607f0a7f01ec3c3919d295306bac@unizar.es>
X-Sender: jsaldana@unizar.es
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.5
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/DWXrTbncb1-7I6R_Z5GII_GK_EI>
Cc: Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org>, Matthew Ford <ford@isoc.org>, gaia@irtf.org, Aaron Kaplan <aaron@lo-res.org>, Internet Research Steering Group <irsg@irtf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Review required: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:51:45 -0000

Hi,

We agree with Lars. As all the discussion has been done in the list, we 
have no problem on discussing in there.

IMHO, everyone had the option to incude their view. We have discussed 
the document since June 2014, and we have got contributions from many 
people, including community networks. In fact, some paragraphs have been 
contributed by active members of CNs (you can see it in the XML file, 
where comments have been adding reflecting the author of each part). Our 
intention was to reach a wide consensus, and we thought we had got it, 
according to the WG last call.

However, it seems there are still some concerns. So please send your 
comments to the GAIA list.

Thanks again,

Jose
PS: I am going on holidays today, so I will not be available for a week.

El 2016-03-20 14:52, Eggert, Lars escribió:
> RG list may be better, if they agree to go public.
> 
> --
> Sent from a mobile device; please excuse typos.
> +49 151 120 55791
> 
>> On Mar 20, 2016, at 14:05, Aaron Kaplan <aaron@lo-res.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 01:00:17PM +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 20/03/16 12:51, Aaron Kaplan wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:12:50PM +0100, Jose Saldana wrote:
>>>>> The new version of the draft has just been submitted.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards and thanks a lot!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jose
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The paper rised some eyebrows amongst the community networks -
>>>> in a surprised, rather negative way.
>>>> People had the feeling that the paper does not reflect reality very
>>>> much.
>>>> 
>>>> Seems like the community networks were not really interviewed 
>>>> properly.
>>> 
>>> That sound concerning but not actionable.
>>> 
>>> Is there any way to get detailed feedback on that that would
>>> allow the authors/RG to improve the draft or otherwise document
>>> what's claimed to be missing here?
>> 
>> 
>> I think I can help with that.
>> I'll forward all the people who had some comments / were a bit 
>> wondering
>> about the publication to the author.
>> Let's see if it works out.
>> 
>> Best,
>> a.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> gaia mailing list
>> gaia@irtf.org
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia