Re: [gaia] Review required: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments

Aaron Kaplan <aaron@lo-res.org> Sun, 20 March 2016 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron@lo-res.org>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D966112D78A; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 06:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ajoUPhsecCI9; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 06:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mate.lo-res.org (mate.lo-res.org [193.238.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60FB312D62B; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 06:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mate.lo-res.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 16BD6404E4; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:05:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:05:32 +0100
From: Aaron Kaplan <aaron@lo-res.org>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <20160320130532.GE32067@mate.lo-res.org>
References: <003101d17914$247b6b30$6d724190$@unizar.es> <56E8294E.6040807@article19.org> <a1bda1d46bf7fa6c87ea9c678823b38a@unizar.es> <56EC0A21.8010009@article19.org> <00c301d18128$a40e71a0$ec2b54e0$@unizar.es> <20160320125110.GD32067@mate.lo-res.org> <56EE9EE1.9030700@cs.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56EE9EE1.9030700@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/E2YGn4vGQUKp-BnlXJKb0wcWv9M>
Cc: 'Niels ten Oever' <niels@article19.org>, 'Matthew Ford' <ford@isoc.org>, gaia@irtf.org, Aaron Kaplan <aaron@lo-res.org>, 'Internet Research Steering Group' <irsg@irtf.org>, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Review required: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:05:36 -0000

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 01:00:17PM +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> 
> On 20/03/16 12:51, Aaron Kaplan wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:12:50PM +0100, Jose Saldana wrote:
> >> The new version of the draft has just been submitted.
> >>
> >> Best regards and thanks a lot!
> >>
> >> Jose
> > 
> > 
> > The paper rised some eyebrows amongst the community networks - 
> > in a surprised, rather negative way.
> > People had the feeling that the paper does not reflect reality very
> > much.
> > 
> > Seems like the community networks were not really interviewed properly.
> 
> That sound concerning but not actionable.
> 
> Is there any way to get detailed feedback on that that would
> allow the authors/RG to improve the draft or otherwise document
> what's claimed to be missing here?


I think I can help with that.
I'll forward all the people who had some comments / were a bit wondering
about the publication to the author.
Let's see if it works out.

Best,
a.