Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal
Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com> Sun, 04 June 2017 14:24 UTC
Return-Path: <cattekwaad@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881C2129B38 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 07:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sXUNexzStpHb for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 07:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22a.google.com (mail-wr0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6375129B33 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 07:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id v104so26755579wrb.0 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 07:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=uSlwX7VaNLNcAwL6Suixw4MhZ7vuDVaUd+b9s1FznAM=; b=ZGRpzMTYSAOUqYJYNZinp+4qwy/jKYSa2Lv//0AOwS6V95ykroTbMiE2L8ntMD0Es3 eRdufopRqfcPPhjMjd7/6L2/ImmXVE5EYrEkrhBY3QMSkYb+PnG1Kon5jPVUnkpp+spk GD+cy6EaV10D1IBNXkUAq8DXt8TpzsjXXf6kb6iJQiOzY1gRKcGH81W6ayCkGnVxyfEB e5qhivzxkrBV7rXCO0uT0s2AfB3qQFShuLdMK2WAiyGCvea2Q/DMMoo/oKbvknvFKHdn vPQI3Y7mEoWSouvgMDxCiVXmoVQ3NO4qQzBjr08TTVOl0pk5EhOSaXGde/WU08EhHYVV kW4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uSlwX7VaNLNcAwL6Suixw4MhZ7vuDVaUd+b9s1FznAM=; b=o5rAAUDXFBJ6b6XalrbEbQ+RmygxI7vA1eqVxRncGYhhutPpSsjJy6gwqvZoNMrass r5IwbaG9ubalbCcx6FdEL7wUKXnbgRWS9wYW5h17qSKo23T6Vj28AXJA2ieGaAkZ4GNq AlJ3z3flJvhaJINA+VKLmL9tvdQtKTPyC0oVmsJiQpKs8Svwq9hwpM3YZsuB22jlCRJE RxV7wYtFGh6Jk421t3QL5FpQ2Oa0Acm3m95VHKaTWKqFCyNCKHMCNtlqFUQL6nEyl20i oFQigfQ8YTd28RHIqL1qpWMIn2bK+vrEjQv/NHAEUUYUrZ7s0ZByFQTGECrU/nJxfUeW VYuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCfKfslQVtM27Zo94i9UdV98PczQkAL9xdEWtKNZqqz0DN+rVLk +5ovcj5Y+X6puDpjorZI2zGCPwqBVA==
X-Received: by 10.223.183.32 with SMTP id l32mr3242354wre.115.1496586295231; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 07:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: cattekwaad@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.144.162 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 07:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEeTejJvchjnoizLKB9zNJmNrVDLm1eKvMPa8S8V+FopiGMnEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD499eKWfpdtizyecKOrBPdM3DffZdoMaiA6_LCs1Orga=A0bA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHxHgge4wYszOQkGMwzuLv4-BkJyRa7Rx1hPXad5MWYd6ov12g@mail.gmail.com> <A029E101-29F9-4AFD-8065-521B6A7CEF5F@libre.ws> <CAHxHgge62bmw2Hz8_mkxbH2YhCS67y0f0FTYWkk0NXR6bipzig@mail.gmail.com> <59A2FF0C-E84E-40BD-B4C7-0265F9760C32@libre.ws> <CAEeTejJvchjnoizLKB9zNJmNrVDLm1eKvMPa8S8V+FopiGMnEw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 15:24:54 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: jr6fpP7BVmBabPggVZpbH5uxqu4
Message-ID: <CAD499eL4PPqCpuZCC3C4Pptze13mt-GaEuL_GJwrB6fXHbn5=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jon Crowcroft <jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Nicolas Pace <nico@libre.ws>, Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>, gaia <gaia@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043889bc80cac30551232632"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/FWsdnC627eVXE0CKGzLOyG5Lt58>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 14:24:59 -0000
Great discussion! And I agree with much of what has been said. But that still leaves us with the open question of what the response of AFRINIC should be to shutdowns. I agree this proposal was problematic (as I point out in the blog), but am interested to hear what advocacy, support, and solidarity by AFRINIC could/should look like in the case of Internet shutdowns. Best, On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Jon Crowcroft <jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > the problem with witholding a resource as a lever to try to reduce > censorship > (witholding of access to the net) is that its > a) an implicitly negative message to counter a negative message, > which takes the risk of accusations of hypocrisy > b) it risks collective punishment > i.e. hurts victims of governments' misguided policy, > as well as government agency, which is over-reach > c) the proposal is the opposite of basic internet philosophy, as per > Gilmore : > *"The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it."* > which means that the proposal risks undermining citizen/peer actions > > intentions are good, but advocacy, support, solidarity seems like a better > road > > > On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Nicolas Pace <nico@libre.ws> wrote: > >> Thanks Vint for sharing your point of view. >> If I may give my two cents, through advocacy is that, in the summit here >> in nayrobi the community all together wrote the proposal. >> >> There needs to be stronger efforts to make internet less >> country-dependant and more resilient... But these are urgent matters. While >> we get to that resilient future, we need to support our communities on >> their decisions regarding their own problematics. >> >> I understand that IP address may seem to be a technical thing, but >> governments are hijacking them into a political standpoint. >> >> Instead of making this a specific action, I would suggest that we could >> work out a regulation that requires IP tenants not to shutdown connectivity >> as a condition to receive their ranges... Or some sort of agreement on >> openness. >> >> Could it be possible, and would it be useful to tackle this issue? What >> do you think? >> >> >> On June 3, 2017 4:41:04 PM GMT+03:00, Vint Cerf <vint@google.com> wrote: >>> >>> I implied it: advocacy >>> >>> v >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Nicolas Pace <nico@libre.ws> wrote: >>> >>>> What would be your approach on this matter then? I'm curious to know >>>> >>>> >>>> On June 3, 2017 4:36:36 PM GMT+03:00, Vint Cerf <vint@google.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> My reaction: politicizing IP address allocation is a mistake and could >>>>> have enormous, negative consequences including a wide range of >>>>> fragmentation and legal intimidation of the RIRs. Advocacy is fine but >>>>> withholding IP addresses for political reasons is not wise. >>>>> >>>>> v >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>>>>> CFR invited me to write a blog about the recent AFRINIC proposal to >>>>>> deny IP addresses to governments mandating Internet shutdowns. Might be of >>>>>> interest. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.cfr.org/article/should-technical-actors-play-pol >>>>>> itical-role-internet-age >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Corinne J.N. Cath >>>>>> Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute & Alan Turing Institute >>>>>> >>>>>> Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath >>>>>> Email: ccath@turing.ac.uk & corinnecath@gmail.com >>>>>> Twitter: @C_Cath >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> gaia mailing list >>>>>> gaia@irtf.org >>>>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> New postal address: >>>>> Google >>>>> 1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor >>>>> Reston, VA 20190 >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> New postal address: >>> Google >>> 1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor >>> Reston, VA 20190 >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gaia mailing list >> gaia@irtf.org >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia >> >> > -- Corinne J.N. Cath Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute & Alan Turing Institute Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath Email: ccath@turing.ac.uk & corinnecath@gmail.com Twitter: @C_Cath
- [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Corinne Cath
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Vint Cerf
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Nicolas Pace
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Vint Cerf
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Nicolas Pace
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Vint Cerf
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Nicolas Pace
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Vint Cerf
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Nicolas Pace
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Vint Cerf
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Jon Crowcroft
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Corinne Cath
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Vint Cerf
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Sebastian Bellagamba
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Arjuna Sathiaseelan
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Alejandro Acosta
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Alejandro Acosta
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Amreesh Phokeer
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Arjuna Sathiaseelan
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Mallory Knodel
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Maureen Hernandez
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Marwan Fayed
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Adam Burns