Re: [gaia] How to carry on with the "manyfolks" draft

Arjuna Sathiaseelan <arjuna.sathiaseelan@cl.cam.ac.uk> Tue, 01 July 2014 05:03 UTC

Return-Path: <arjuna.sathiaseelan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180A31A0104 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id byXi1XKHGPbU for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x22c.google.com (mail-oa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 520BE1A0100 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id i7so10051103oag.31 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0nwX6b/5mBOiuc2/5KSHh9emIjQw3miGVn2SNtSF5FA=; b=XUNFKq6NCyMsboHRVjCJwiyiEmf3dekr/jE8uwQ0Oyyu8ouud6YJ+nXgWVCOblgxf7 H/o+01umn6UXsEALUmEGfCHLPP+EOHQML1lJBqaJhOLKPB/8Bs8otHzAjLBUGmTBMUOM XpBiJSg5k5FQPdOxeUqLHX1uaqNwXU++tVSrriifepAr5rFymJzn8IjPhOsqhdAsTKBs 6TD1e/gIkYGv1cdqTAsoFodVW2Bzvc4qoUVGyORbZt3dyBZgAFj2fpI+sBvncsl8laUp 5C9IW8e73I/29iuUE7RoWLKrdDEnQAaz9kXxzaS2VfCt1UkA15BEuzRT3EiQEkzJiGJL 0xcw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.65.170 with SMTP id y10mr25655969oes.45.1404191016738; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: arjuna.sathiaseelan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.60.40.131 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 22:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <001301cf9443$f9646660$ec2d3320$@unizar.es>
References: <001301cf9443$f9646660$ec2d3320$@unizar.es>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 06:03:36 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: katN1y-y8q2itnCzEemysofKvfA
Message-ID: <CAPaG1Amc+QsusjQFbgX66vF-vj+FKcaXLniBq_LaFwz2675UeQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Arjuna Sathiaseelan <arjuna.sathiaseelan@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/IjezfmubrsqfQeHXTpEKDial2ok
Cc: gaia <gaia@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [gaia] How to carry on with the "manyfolks" draft
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://irtf.org/mail-archive/web/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 05:03:39 -0000

i think we should do (1): use the current feedback to revise and get
more contributors onboard. But I am not sure why you are proposing to
change the title of the doc? its like changing the original
vision/goal and from the discussions so far - i dont think thats what
the members suggested - its more about making the classification more
inclusive.

Arjuna

On 30 June 2014 10:16, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I have tried to extract the main ideas from the discussion in the list, and
> I have built this document.
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/67016195/discussion_CN_def_v1.docx
>
>
>
> As you can see, there are lots of contributions in the list, from people
> with wide experience.
>
>
>
>
>
> In my opinion, the first problem to solve is the scope of the draft. From my
> point of view, there are three different ways:
>
>
>
> 1- Writing a very broad document including
> “all-the-networks-we-are-talking-about-here”, and then classifying them.
> Community Networks would become a section of the document, and could be
> distinguished from other approaches.
>
>
>
> In this case we should remove the words “Community Networks” from the title,
> and try to find a “broad name” including everything. What about a “negative
> definition”?: something similar to NGO: like “non-operator networks” or
> “non-conventional networks”. Perhaps “user-centric networks” can also fit.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2- Writing a number of documents: one about community networks, other about
> FON-like networks, etc.
>
>
>
> This option is really difficult: it will be impossible to find consensus
> when defining the borders between different network models.
>
>
>
>
>
> 3- Assuming that this is an impossible task. Let’s forget about a
> definition.
>
>
>
> I think this is not an option. The objective of GAIA is writing good
> documents about these things…
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jose Saldana
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing list
> gaia@irtf.org
> https://irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>



-- 
Arjuna Sathiaseelan | http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~as2330/