Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal
Nicolas Pace <nico@libre.ws> Sat, 03 June 2017 13:50 UTC
Return-Path: <nico@libre.ws>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C90128ACA for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 06:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.769
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (bad RSA signature)" header.d=libre.ws
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-KYIjiPBci4 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 06:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from libre.ws (libre.ws [139.162.39.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A8DB129577 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 06:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 16:49:54 +0300
In-Reply-To: <CAHxHgge62bmw2Hz8_mkxbH2YhCS67y0f0FTYWkk0NXR6bipzig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD499eKWfpdtizyecKOrBPdM3DffZdoMaiA6_LCs1Orga=A0bA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHxHgge4wYszOQkGMwzuLv4-BkJyRa7Rx1hPXad5MWYd6ov12g@mail.gmail.com> <A029E101-29F9-4AFD-8065-521B6A7CEF5F@libre.ws> <CAHxHgge62bmw2Hz8_mkxbH2YhCS67y0f0FTYWkk0NXR6bipzig@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----H9CH65AB0EXH2QLR4TX021J53ZI9LK"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>
CC: gaia <gaia@irtf.org>, Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com>
From: Nicolas Pace <nico@libre.ws>
Message-ID: <59A2FF0C-E84E-40BD-B4C7-0265F9760C32@libre.ws>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=libre.ws; s=mail; t=1496497826; bh=2MSZE/2nCYYHPWmRovgYbZNipkggNJDpPkAxwsKZ0+M=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:To:CC:From:Message-ID; b=PTSHOvbH3cCHDHNW2iX8Pf2HbVEowcuiu2tQobLrY2sELkK8xZ7NKOzJ91cpVYV5zViXBIPHeG1y+0WSEiz3NeuKpZTUWACiOoqoR68cqlYsUGsOqQspPDEJvb7DcZQD3kLo5cW+lhcVS18rPtX/Pl1thp3jgozvgGGZkF3C5w8=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/Z5xmCzJge1bhmCgk7DYlInb1Eks>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:50:30 -0000
Thanks Vint for sharing your point of view. If I may give my two cents, through advocacy is that, in the summit here in nayrobi the community all together wrote the proposal. There needs to be stronger efforts to make internet less country-dependant and more resilient... But these are urgent matters. While we get to that resilient future, we need to support our communities on their decisions regarding their own problematics. I understand that IP address may seem to be a technical thing, but governments are hijacking them into a political standpoint. Instead of making this a specific action, I would suggest that we could work out a regulation that requires IP tenants not to shutdown connectivity as a condition to receive their ranges... Or some sort of agreement on openness. Could it be possible, and would it be useful to tackle this issue? What do you think? On June 3, 2017 4:41:04 PM GMT+03:00, Vint Cerf <vint@google.com> wrote: >I implied it: advocacy > >v > > >On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Nicolas Pace <nico@libre.ws> wrote: > >> What would be your approach on this matter then? I'm curious to know >> >> >> On June 3, 2017 4:36:36 PM GMT+03:00, Vint Cerf <vint@google.com> >wrote: >>> >>> My reaction: politicizing IP address allocation is a mistake and >could >>> have enormous, negative consequences including a wide range of >>> fragmentation and legal intimidation of the RIRs. Advocacy is fine >but >>> withholding IP addresses for political reasons is not wise. >>> >>> v >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> CFR invited me to write a blog about the recent AFRINIC proposal to >deny >>>> IP addresses to governments mandating Internet shutdowns. Might be >of >>>> interest. >>>> >>>> https://www.cfr.org/article/should-technical-actors-play-pol >>>> itical-role-internet-age >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Corinne J.N. Cath >>>> Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute & Alan Turing Institute >>>> >>>> Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath >>>> Email: ccath@turing.ac.uk & corinnecath@gmail.com >>>> Twitter: @C_Cath >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> gaia mailing list >>>> gaia@irtf.org >>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> New postal address: >>> Google >>> 1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor >>> Reston, VA 20190 >>> >> > > >-- >New postal address: >Google >1875 Explorer Street, 10th Floor >Reston, VA 20190
- [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Corinne Cath
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Vint Cerf
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Nicolas Pace
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Vint Cerf
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Nicolas Pace
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Vint Cerf
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Nicolas Pace
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Vint Cerf
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Nicolas Pace
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Vint Cerf
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Jon Crowcroft
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Corinne Cath
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Vint Cerf
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Sebastian Bellagamba
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Arjuna Sathiaseelan
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Alejandro Acosta
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Alejandro Acosta
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Amreesh Phokeer
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Arjuna Sathiaseelan
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Mallory Knodel
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Maureen Hernandez
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Marwan Fayed
- Re: [gaia] Blog on AFRINIC proposal Adam Burns