Re: [gaia] What if all phones were always on the Internet?

Steve Song <stevesong@nsrc.org> Fri, 27 November 2015 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.song@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EA81A0199 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:05:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d3mZkU29Sto1 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:05:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00D4E1B334E for <gaia@irtf.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:05:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by oies6 with SMTP id s6so61504851oie.1 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:05:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=i2ttlEDel3G/e5BJDiBJEttytZbdVqYwHFbkJnnhCIQ=; b=z2VshsfmyxDxaALAIcEsgZj0F/enqBnQuRTay0PYScvSaT9GOIyZ3a7LfyhRgnA9GQ b8ATv1o+AGJXZBU9AV74awIw4KFZAlAFwQOiOtn0ES9eFArT4dYc3y6bm5ye8rxscrQ8 BUc365Rpr3N+xBRDdisKDUQNdOUuDbaWGBEjcimCHU/ay9sgSBEQsjZ8vgl8dgiBOir5 yUOuC+rUlHuEBPTCTlW7ptQL1TSuWL+LZW0XVioSCvabBkQ1iq1vqyI4MH1RsQClpR7T Jgw2ebvTo0bxawZ64DaqtyfauWLJ7xwe/ksvDr10Ho5nWuRy3fnWUMnPKDu4q/3CrJpy Xzww==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.197.150 with SMTP id v144mr32912272oif.31.1448625917264; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:05:17 -0800 (PST)
Sender: stephen.song@gmail.com
Received: by 10.202.54.214 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 04:05:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAPaG1A=QygueRdP9NDLoWrG4AKb=OF083u491SmZN-1ysZjMMg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD_CWO34dYnp0-_4FL1Rot8EGdg_vzPqH9Ougin83j=fXQHXHw@mail.gmail.com> <EE158BCE-E669-4C60-8616-357D185A6D17@mac.com> <CAPaG1A=QygueRdP9NDLoWrG4AKb=OF083u491SmZN-1ysZjMMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 08:05:17 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: QF7XhIw3KzHM022wBgcmodMUl_Q
Message-ID: <CAD_CWO14tMQPsvr_ShNP=wHzWSZn5uzyQYtFxRz+KtVAdvXOEA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Steve Song <stevesong@nsrc.org>
To: gaia <gaia@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134f1d8362be005258481aa"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/_tMEp_taXJFyCmaxlkHoZvOjcos>
Subject: Re: [gaia] What if all phones were always on the Internet?
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:05:20 -0000

Hi Arjuna,

It is already possible, on Android, to turn off background data updates and
to do per-app tuning of background updates and data consumption in
general.  What I would imagine is that when a phone runs out of data and
finds itself in basic rate mode, then it would only update apps/services
that have been actively selected by the user e.g. whatsapp, twitter,
signal, telegram, FB messenger, email, browser, etc. The selectivity about
apps and services would then be in the hands of the consumer not the
provider.

Cheers... Steve


On 26 November 2015 at 21:22, Arjuna Sathiaseelan <
arjuna.sathiaseelan@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> Very nice Jim.
>
> One problem of giving specific low usage caps in access could be there is
> quite a lot of mobile apps background traffic which randomly consume the
> usage caps?
>
> As i pointed out earlier it will be really interesting to know what can we
> browse/do with today's apps/services over 9.6 kbps..as steve mentioned
> earlier this requires redesigning apps/content - FB is doing that but
> 9.6kbps is really pushing the limit? how would today's transport protocols
> work?
>
> Regards
> On 26 Nov 2015 19:51, "Jim Forster" <jrforster@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> Steve,
>>
>> I think it’s a great idea!
>>
>> AirJaldi has been recently offering two different pre-paid hot spot
>> systems.  One, called XWF (Express WiFi) is offered in Rishikesh and
>> Garwhal district of Uttrakhand.  Facebook/Internet.org
>> <http://internet.org> did the software for XWF; AirJaldi deployed the
>> access points on our backbone in that district and manages the sales
>> agents.  See this NY Time article
>> <http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/facebook-strives-to-bring-cheap-wi-fi-to-rural-india-2/> for
>> more info.  It is intended that this system will use their Free Basics
>> system to give free access to certain sites.
>>
>> The second pre-paid service AirJaldi has is called JaldiFi. A couple
>> AirJaldi engineers did the software, using various Mikrotik & Ubiquity
>> features.  JaldiFi is deploying in various places throughout AirJaldi’s
>> network, including Kangra Valley, Kumaon, and Jharkand.  JaldiFi does not
>> use Free Basics; instead we simply give registered users 10-20MB/day free
>> service.  Registration is free and automated (users must supply a mobile
>> phone number & then we send them a username/pw).  It’s obvious but worth
>> noting that 10MB is 1/100th of 1GB, so a lot of ‘free’ users don’t impact
>> the network much. It’s our belief that if the service is priced affordably,
>> enough people will pay to make it worth our while.  Pricing is about
>> Rs80/GB (~$1.25/GB), with some plans for as little Rs25.  Kumaon area
>> prices are here <http://www.jaldifi.net/kumaon.html>.
>>
>> Mawingu in Kenya does it a little differently.  For about 300Ksh, users
>> get high speed service for a month, or if they don’t have that much money,
>> they can buy a week’s service for 100Ksh.  Mawingu doesn’t give them
>> completely unlimited service, but we find that the great majority of
>> customers don’t use too much for us; email & web browsing is easily
>> accommodated, but heavy YouTube/video watching eats up the MBs quickly.
>> The heaviest users will find then that their speed slowed way down, to
>> about 128kbps.  That’s fine for email & tolerable for web browsing so
>> they’re not cut off, but if they want more high speed for video, they’ll
>> need to pay some more.
>>
>> US-centric salutation: Happy Thanksgiving everyone!
>>
>>
>>   — Jim
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 26, 2015, at 6:36 AM, Steve Song <stevesong@nsrc.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Following on some of the previous discussion about the non-linear
>> relationship between Internet speed and value to the consumer; and
>> reflecting on some of the discussions on zero-rating at the IGF; and
>> thinking further about the PAYG model that enabled the dramatic growth of
>> mobile telephony in emerging markets, I came to the conclusion that a
>> low-bitrate, always-on Internet for all mobile phones would benefit
>> everyone.
>>
>> https://manypossibilities.net/2015/11/zero-rating-a-modest-proposal/
>>
>> Would love to have the idea critiqued (gently).
>>
>> Thanks... Steve Song
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gaia mailing list
>> gaia@irtf.org
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>>
>>


-- 
+1 902 529 0046
stevesong@nsrc.org
http://nsrc.org