Re: [gaia] fb's Free Basics in India

Jon Crowcroft <jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk> Mon, 28 December 2015 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <crowcroft@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D021A905A for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 03:53:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zdmpzl_5Mfmi for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 03:53:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com (mail-lb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B81F1A9062 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 03:53:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-x235.google.com with SMTP id oh2so90401397lbb.3 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 03:53:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9k+hSFAxLDuzB4dRukkzuMmXngadsx65WGrvmaIiMLg=; b=NqnqYGMU4//oSGKJ3Iv1b939lXmjrLE/4RFtzaE6ijk6ZwYlwGPu1OCxrk9J2/tl/u R7NwZ0eg8uUO6VzctNd4WyIhJOW6Uqw7UDWF/YAGdkkh6p45hWZWgmSlHuRBYPEGoTc2 jf4O1QWBUFe3y0BeNW4MljwbXno0dNO2jvAt9oVk4ZfCW7CEYrPo53aETk7XhQhJBNnc MUmMZy0LGZLfEG3tpiUVSY3tojJSYxXRsX1vKlZWiznO8eNLut3gAqCVKl8KmGMEQ/bN zJ3spkgYEC80yxTWzhrr7QuO2AG4G3Flc/bmkdF9wbI3dK5RBvDNCRPE8n/YYESHXdht CllQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.170.167 with SMTP id an7mr18924824lbc.37.1451303609316; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 03:53:29 -0800 (PST)
Sender: crowcroft@gmail.com
Received: by 10.25.21.200 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 03:53:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56811386.4060408@cam.ac.uk>
References: <D2A08FB4.F350%y.elkhatib@lancaster.ac.uk> <56811386.4060408@cam.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:53:29 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2ZGy_F0h1na0fOObVKV3Ipvo77Q
Message-ID: <CAEeTejKzaKAj38=4dbzoqQJy+KJmC7tX3PJPqfdccZvY+apakQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jon Crowcroft <jon.crowcroft@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: Richard Dent <rd459@cam.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c368cc183bca0527f3f4df"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/cuKiAZGWS3JQet21fuElsG54k-c>
Cc: "gaia@irtf.org" <gaia@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [gaia] fb's Free Basics in India
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:53:33 -0000

Facebook have (at least) two questions to answer:

1/ how do they decide transparently, what not to let people get to via
"basics"?
is it something that costs facebook too much, or is it just something that
doesn't earn facebook more money (e.g. through advertising revenue)?
(the regulatory position is obviously more general than this, but I'd just
ask this to start with, as I think the idea of not reaching all internet
sites that have a public IP is a Very Bad Precedent that better have a Very
Good Governance answer).

2/  if facebook are so nice, howcome I can't friend someone on another
social network directly from my facebook account? frankly, a facebook page
is a web page. I can link to anyone's web page from my home page, and they
can link to mine. Apps can follow those links. and if the pages have any
scripts/active/upload capability, can modify/add info there - so what are
the motives for facebook preventing this (and they do)? I can think of
some, but I'd like to know their specific business case arguments that an
open web (and open social media) is not as good or better than a walled
garden (see 1/ :-)

IP connectivity, and HTTP/URL connectivity are both network economies, and
various scaling laws apply (whether you buy Metcalfe's law or the
variants). Walled gardens are semi-monopolies, whatever level they operate
at. They may not necessarily be evil, but they better operate transparently
so the anti-trust people can check they are not just abusing their
privileged market position, or they are not welcome in democratic
capitalist societies...(or some other societies either:)

cheers
jon


On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Richard Dent <rd459@cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> Zuckerberg responds to the move with editorial:
>
> <http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toi-edit-page/free-basics-protects-net-neutrality/>
> http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toi-edit-page/free-basics-protects-net-neutrality/
>
>
> On 23/12/2015 17:51, El Khatib, Yehia (elkhatib) wrote:
>
> Tension between Indian telecom regulators and Facebook over its Free
> Basics program
> http://tcrn.ch/1On2V1P
>
>
> /Yehia
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing listgaia@irtf.orghttps://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>
>
> --
> PhD Candidate
> Department of Sociology
> University of Cambridge
> www.openaccessphd.com
> @richarddent
> Tel: 07827 537537
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing list
> gaia@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>
>