Re: [gaia] RG Last Call: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments-02

Arjuna Sathiaseelan <arjuna.sathiaseelan@cl.cam.ac.uk> Sat, 12 December 2015 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <arjuna.sathiaseelan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CFF1A8700 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 04:45:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.123
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.123 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E9PdmVNdjCBu for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 04:45:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB5861A86FC for <gaia@irtf.org>; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 04:45:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lfcy184 with SMTP id y184so21735682lfc.1 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 04:45:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YSKknSNBiX8PotOhtK/uL/CuP5qv+QmDvz530o2fvaw=; b=CHWAZxMHYQKzkgZXpFaizkSv+Qrbh0evTiOHIok+DIN2dmHxAgPkdubVl3Jal3Xs/7 NPoCVABJTu8TDImfDuEbzebeNVMO3hZb9dqK9uZnWFckvinYsRZAdFxXhm6SJZt4VJqp izBydkLF7h9RmNiP2BR3oAruM24kNKxSutv7k9A4z5udEHxZ5ugmP3312AomGvrzahIy NF6Htw89DtLveA4aenGNYoNdRI6ppJuE/mCo39QsmpTzDPd/I0XzhaBdDqiLu5I8u+yt racOr8zNrgkLIfwOnGL3tjTrtkjCjp0cHfFDMPPJVXChRnRaBxpvPqOUVGPKzcC2boOp DAhQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.148.202 with SMTP id w193mr9848251lfd.130.1449924318594; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 04:45:18 -0800 (PST)
Sender: arjuna.sathiaseelan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.2.97 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 04:45:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7F910716-1B51-41A6-9DC8-170F30C37803@isoc.org>
References: <7F910716-1B51-41A6-9DC8-170F30C37803@isoc.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 12:45:18 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: JTIfUv9B4kl6CrOd8p2teC1kATk
Message-ID: <CAPaG1Ak3JsTn4O2DyO1JzN9RdbKR0XVMZB2Hy5+t_dFH4gEdog@mail.gmail.com>
From: Arjuna Sathiaseelan <arjuna.sathiaseelan@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: Mat Ford <ford@isoc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114035ecf60f0b0526b2cf39
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/imdNbiNiUcCR0l54Dz4l2HFqRaY>
Cc: gaia <gaia@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [gaia] RG Last Call: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments-02
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 12:45:23 -0000

Thanks Mat.

I have been recently discussing with Roger from Guifi about whether
community networks should be termed as Alternative Networks or should it be
called Complimentary Networks considering that community networks could end
up sharing infrastructure with network operators who could see this as a
great opportunity to access the last mile without a CAPEX.

So is Alternative Networks the right terminology or should we have
Complimentary Networks?

Regards

On 1 December 2015 at 16:28, Mat Ford <ford@isoc.org> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I think it’s time we tried to conclude our work on
> draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments. Jose detailed the changes
> in the most recent update when he announced the update to the list, so I
> won’t repeat those here. I have not seen any further discussion.
>
> If you have any concerns or further comments regarding the content of this
> document, please raise them on this mailing list by Tuesday December 15th.
> I hope to initiate IRSG review of the document immediately thereafter.
>
> Thanks,
> Mat
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing list
> gaia@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>



-- 
Arjuna Sathiaseelan
Personal: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~as2330/
N4D Lab: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~as2330/n4d