Re: [gaia] What if all phones were always on the Internet?

Phil Regnauld <regnauld@nsrc.org> Thu, 26 November 2015 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <regnauld@x0.dk>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A727B1B3AA7 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:00:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V_POrysYVMUh for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:00:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from moof.catpipe.net (moof.catpipe.net [194.28.252.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C151B3AA5 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 07:00:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (moof.catpipe.net [194.28.252.64]) by localhost.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE9F4CE8D9; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:00:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from moof.catpipe.net ([194.28.252.64]) by localhost (moof.catpipe.net [194.28.252.64]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JY26yPSyS2MR; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:00:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from macbook.bluepipe.net (gw.bluepipe.dk [91.221.206.68]) (Authenticated sender: relayuser) by moof.catpipe.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0CD394CE8D5; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:00:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by macbook.bluepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4720B50E6442; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:00:54 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:00:54 +0100
From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@nsrc.org>
To: Steve Song <stevesong@nsrc.org>
Message-ID: <20151126150054.GX33871@macbook.bluepipe.net>
References: <CAD_CWO34dYnp0-_4FL1Rot8EGdg_vzPqH9Ougin83j=fXQHXHw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAD_CWO34dYnp0-_4FL1Rot8EGdg_vzPqH9Ougin83j=fXQHXHw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Darwin 15.0.0 x86_64
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/q6ZTMGe9S6kf_Id4v_8MiMOar-U>
Cc: gaia <gaia@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [gaia] What if all phones were always on the Internet?
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:00:59 -0000

Steve Song (stevesong) writes:
> I came to the conclusion that a
> low-bitrate, always-on Internet for all mobile phones would benefit
> everyone.

	Sort of what you get when you reach your "cap-which-isn't-a-cap"
	on your postpaid plan in overdeveloped nations. Here it's typically
	128 Kbps ad libitum until end of the month.